Suppression of Unwanted $ZZ$ Interactions in a Hybrid Two-Qubit System
Jaseung Ku, Xuexin Xu, Markus Brink, David C. McKay, Jared B. Hertzberg, Mohammad H. Ansari, B. L. T. Plourde
arXiv:2003.02775 · DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.125.200504 · 2020-03-05 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Mitigating crosstalk errors, whether classical or quantum mechanical, is critically important for achieving high-fidelity entangling gates in multi-qubit circuits. For weakly anharmonic superconducting qubits, unwanted $ZZ$ interactions can be suppressed by combining qubits with opposite anharmonicity. We present experimental measurements and theoretical modeling of two-qubit gate error for gates based on the cross resonance interaction between a capacitively shunted flux qubit and a transmon and demonstrate the elimination of the $ZZ$ interaction.
Similar papers
Modeling and Suppressing Unwanted Parasitic Interactions in Superconducting Circuits
similarity 0.89Xuexin Xu · 2024 · arXiv:2407.08318
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-fidelity two-qubit gates with transmon qubits using bipolar flux pulses and tunable couplers
similarity 0.89Nikita S. Smirnov et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2509.04965
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
ZZ freedom in two qubit gates
similarity 0.88Xuexin Xu & M. H. Ansari · 2020 · arXiv:2009.00485
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scalable Method for Eliminating Residual ZZ Interaction between Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.88Zhongchu Ni et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental observation of dynamical blockade between transmon qubits via ZZ interaction engineering
similarity 0.88Marco Riccardi et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2601.11714
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Accurate methods for the analysis of strong-drive effects in parametric gates
similarity 0.87Alexandru Petrescu et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.02343
Source status unknown — claims are unverified