Theory of Strain-Induced Magnetic Order and Splitting of $T_c$ and $T_{\rm TRSB}$ in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$
Astrid T. Rømer, Andreas Kreisel, Marvin A. Müller, P. J. Hirschfeld, Ilya M. Eremin, Brian M. Andersen
arXiv:2003.13340 · DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVB.102.054506 · 2020-03-30 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The internal structure of the superconducting state in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ remains elusive at present, and exhibits evidence for time-reversal symmetry breaking. Recent muon spin relaxation measurements under uniaxial strain have revealed an increasing splitting between the superconducting critical temperature $T_c$ and the onset of time-reversal symmetry breaking $T_{\rm TRSB}$ with applied strain [Grinenko et al., arXiv:2001.08152]. In addition, static magnetic order is induced by the uniaxial strain beyond $\sim$1 GPa, indicating that unstrained Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ is close to a magnetic quantum critical point. Here, we perform a theoretical study of the magnetic susceptibility and the associated pairing structure as a function of uniaxial strain. It is found that the recent muon relaxation data can be qualitatively explained from the perspective of spin-fluctuation mediated pairing and the associated strain-dependence of accidentally degenerate pair states in unstrained Sr$_2$RuO$_4$. In addition, while unstrained Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ features mainly $(2π/3,2π/3)$ magnetic fluctuations, uniaxial strain promotes $(π,\pmπ/2)$ magnetism.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — disputed claim Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Neutron scattering studies on spin fluctuations in SrRuO
similarity 0.93K. Jenni et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2102.06636
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Why Scanning Tunneling Microscopy on SrRuO sometimes doesn't see the superconducting gap
similarity 0.93Adrian Valadkhani et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.13106
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Puzzling superconductivity in strontium ruthenate: then and now
similarity 0.93James F. Annett & Karol I. Wysokiński · 2026 · arXiv:2607.21194
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stabilizing Even-Parity Chiral Superconductivity in SrRuO
similarity 0.92Han Gyeol Suh et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1912.09525
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for even parity unconventional superconductivity in SrRuO
similarity 0.92Aaron Chronister et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2007.13730
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of strain inhomogeneity on a chiral p-wave superconductor
similarity 0.92Yue Yu & S. Raghu · 2019 · arXiv:1901.03668
Source status unknown — claims are unverified