Eliashberg theory for spin-fluctuations mediated superconductivity -- Application to bulk and monolayer FeSe
Fabian Schrodi, Alex Aperis, Peter M. Oppeneer
arXiv:2004.01539 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.014502 · 2020-04-03
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a novel method for embedding spin and charge fluctuations in an anisotropic, multi-band and full-bandwidth Eliashberg treatment of superconductivity. Our analytical framework, based on the random phase approximation, allows for a selfconsistent calculation of material specific characteristics in the interacting, and more specifically, the superconducting state. We apply this approach to bulk FeSe as representative for the iron-based superconductors and successfully solve for the superconducting transition temperature $T_c$, the gap symmetry and the gap magnitude. We obtain $T_c \approx 6$ K, consistent with experiment ($T_c \approx 8$ K), as well as other quantities in good agreement with experimental observations, thus supporting spin fluctuations mediated pairing in bulk FeSe. On the contrary, applying our approach to monolayer FeSe on SrTiO$_3$ we find that spin fluctuations within the full Eliashberg framework give a $d$-wave gap with $T_c\le 11$ K and therefore cannot provide an explanation for a critical temperature as high as observed experimentally ($T_c \approx 70$ K). Our results hence point towards interfacial electron-phonon coupling as the dominant Cooper pairing mediator in this system.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 11 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 70 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Eliashberg theory for spin fluctuation mediated superconductivity: Application to bulk and monolayer FeSe
similarity 0.91Fabian Schrodi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The phonon mechanism explanation of the superconductivity dichotomy between FeSe and FeS monolayers on STO and other substrates
similarity 0.91Baruch Rosenstein & B. Ya. Shapiro · 2021 · arXiv:2102.03854
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong coupling superconductivity revealed by scanning tunneling microscope in tetragonal FeS
similarity 0.90Xiong Yang et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1605.05184
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A minimum single-band model for low-energy excitations in superconducting KFeSe
similarity 0.90Tao Zhou & Z. D. Wang · 2011 · arXiv:1108.3491
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Highly anisotropic and two-fold symmetric superconducting gap in nematically ordered FeSeS
similarity 0.90H. C. Xu et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1603.05219
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Low-energy spin excitations in Li(0.8)Fe(0.2)ODFeSe superconductor studied with inelastic neutron scattering
similarity 0.90Mingwei Ma et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1611.02602
Source status unknown — claims are unverified