High-Energy Quasiparticle Injection into Mesoscopic Superconductors
Loren D. Alegria, Charlotte G. Bøttcher, Andrew K. Saydjari, Andrew T. Pierce, Seung H. Lee, Shannon P. Harvey, Uri Vool, Amir Yacoby
arXiv:2005.00584 · 2020-05-01
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
At nonzero temperatures, superconductors contain excitations known as Bogoliubov quasiparticles. The mesoscopic dynamics of quasiparticles inform the design of quantum information processors, among other devices. Knowledge of these dynamics stems from experiments in which quasiparticles are injected in a controlled fashion, typically at energies comparable to the pairing energy . Here we perform tunnel spectroscopy of a mesoscopic superconductor under high electric field. We observe quasiparticle injection due to field-emitted electrons with 10^6 times the pairing energy, an unexplored regime of quasiparticle dynamics. Upon application of a gate voltage, the quasiparticle injection decreases the critical current and, at sufficiently high electric field, the field-emission current (< 0.1 nA) switches the mesoscopic superconductor into the normal state, consistent with earlier results. We expect that high-energy injection will be useful for developing quasiparticle-tolerant quantum information processors, will allow rapid control of resonator quality factors, and will enable the design of electric-field-controlled superconducting devices with new functionality.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.109 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ti Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.33 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.186 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ti Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.494 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Active quasiparticle suppression in a non-equilibrium superconductor
similarity 0.92Marco Marín-Suárez et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2002.12052
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetically-controlled Vortex Dynamics in a Ferromagnetic Superconductor
similarity 0.91Joseph Alec Wilcox et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2412.04098
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Towards the discovery of high critical magnetic field superconductors
similarity 0.91Benjamin Geisler et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2601.21044
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge density waves in cuprate superconductors beyond the critical doping
similarity 0.90H. Miao et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2001.10294
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoherence benchmarking of superconducting qubits
similarity 0.89Jonathan Burnett et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1901.04417
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Circuit Architecture for Digital-Analog Quantum Computing
similarity 0.89J. Yu et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2103.15696
Source status unknown — claims are unverified