Multi-Atom Quasiparticle Scattering Interference for Superconductor Energy-Gap Symmetry Determination
Rahul Sharma, Andreas Kreisel, Miguel Antonio Sulangi, Jakob Böker, Andrey Kostin, Milan P. Allan, H. Eisaki, Anna E. Böhmer, Paul C. Canfield, Ilya Eremin, J. C. Séamus Davis, P. J. Hirschfeld, Peter O. Sprau
arXiv:2005.05140 · DOI 10.1038/s41535-020-00303-4 · 2020-05-11 · npj Quantum Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Complete theoretical understanding of the most complex superconductors requires a detailed knowledge of the symmetry of the superconducting energy-gap $Δ_\mathbf{k}^α$, for all momenta $\mathbf{k}$ on the Fermi surface of every band $α$. While there are a variety of techniques for determining $|Δ_\mathbf{k}^α|$, no general method existed to measure the signed values of $Δ_\mathbf{k}^α$. Recently, however, a new technique based on phase-resolved visualization of superconducting quasiparticle interference (QPI) patterns centered on a single non-magnetic impurity atom, was introduced. In principle, energy-resolved and phase-resolved Fourier analysis of these images identifies wavevectors connecting all k-space regions where $Δ_\mathbf{k}^α$ has the same or opposite sign. But use of a single isolated impurity atom, from whose precise location the spatial phase of the scattering interference pattern must be measured is technically difficult. Here we introduce a generalization of this approach for use with multiple impurity atoms, and demonstrate its validity by comparing the $Δ_\mathbf{k}^α$ it generates to the $Δ_\mathbf{k}^α$ determined from single-atom scattering in FeSe where $s_{\pm}$ energy-gap symmetry is established. Finally, to exemplify utility, we use the multi-atom technique on LiFeAs and find scattering interference between the hole-like and electron-like pockets as predicted for $Δ_\mathbf{k}^α$ of opposite sign.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Quasiparticle interference in iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.91A. Akbari et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Detecting sign-changing superconducting gap in LiFeAs using quasiparticle interference
similarity 0.91D. Altenfeld et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1712.03625
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Sign inversion in the superconducting order parameter of LiFeAs inferred from Bogoliubov quasiparticle interference
similarity 0.91Shun Chi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle interference in an iron-based superconductor
similarity 0.90Steffen Sykora & Piers Coleman · 2010 · arXiv:1010.3545
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Robust determination of superconducting gap sign changes via quasiparticle interference
similarity 0.89P. J. Hirschfeld et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1507.08317
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Extracting phase information about the superconducting order parameter from defect bound states
similarity 0.89Shun Chi et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.09088
Source status unknown — claims are unverified