A simple superconductor quantum interference device for testing gravity
Fayçal Hammad, Alexandre Landry
arXiv:2005.05798 · 2020-05-09
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A simple tabletop setup based on a superconducting quantum interference device is proposed for testing the gravitational interaction. A D-shaped superconducting loop has the straight segment immersed inside a massive sphere while the half-circle segment is wrapped around the sphere. The superconducting condensate within the straight arm of the loop thus bathes inside a gravitational simple harmonic oscillator potential while the condensate in the half-circle arm bathes in the constant gravitational potential around the sphere. The resulting phase difference at the Josephson junctions on both sides of the straight arm induces a sinusoidal electric current that has a frequency determined by the precise gravitational potential due to the massive sphere.
Similar papers
Gravitational constant G measured with a superconducting gravimeter
similarity 0.87P. Baldi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting gravity gradiometer for sensitive gravity measurements. II. Experiment
similarity 0.86H. A. Chan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Field-Effect Controllable Metallic Josephson Interferometer
similarity 0.85Federico Paolucci et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1904.08349
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A New Approach to the Josephson Effect
similarity 0.85Yong-Jihn Kim · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0401374
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson current and density of states in proximity circuits with s+- superconductors
similarity 0.85Stanislav Apostolov & Alex Levchenko · 2012 · arXiv:1210.1875
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting gravity gradiometer for sensitive gravity measurements. I. Theory
similarity 0.85H. A. Chan & H. J. Paik
Source status unknown — claims are unverified