Role of the proximity effect for normal-metal quasiparticle traps
R. P. Schmit, F. K. Wilhelm
arXiv:2005.06867 · 2020-05-14 · arXiv: Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The performance of many superconducting devices is degraded in presence of non-equilibrium quasiparticles in the superconducting part. One promising approach towards their evacuation is the use of normal-metal quasiparticle traps, where normal metal is brought into good metallic contact with the superconductor. A voltage biased normal-metal--insulator--superconductor junction equipped with such a trap is used to investigate on the trapping performance and the part played by the superconducting proximity effect therein. This involves an appropriate one-dimensional model of the junction and the numerical solution of Usadel equations describing the non-equilibrium state of the superconductor. The functionality of the trap is determined by the density of states (DOS) at the tunnel barrier. Herein, the proximity effect leads to two antagonistic characteristics affecting the trapping performance: the beneficial reduction of the DOS at an energy $|E| = Δ_{\text{BCS}}$ versus the contraction of the spectral energy gap causing quasiparticle poisoning. For both effects the trap position is decisive, which needs to be taken into account for optimizing the trapping performance. In addition, the conversion between dissipative normal and supercurrent inside the superconducting part with its impact on the quasiparticle density is studied.
Similar papers
Long-ranged triplet supercurrent in a single in-plane ferromagnet with spin-orbit coupled contacts to superconductors
similarity 0.89Johannes R. Eskilt et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1906.07725
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of enhanced proximity effect by mid gap Andreev resonant state in diffusive normal metal / triplet superconductor junctions
similarity 0.89Y. Tanaka et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0411410
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Controllable Vortex Loops in Superconducting Proximity Systems
similarity 0.89Eirik Holm Fyhn & Jacob Linder · 2019 · arXiv:1906.02178
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electromagnetic Proximity Effect: Superconducting Magnonics and Beyond
similarity 0.89Tao Yu et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2506.18502
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetism via superconductivity in SF proximity structures
similarity 0.88V. N. Krivoruchko & V. N. Varyukhin · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0506277
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity and Josephson effects in superconducting hybrid structures
similarity 0.88Yakov Fominov · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0311359
Source status unknown — claims are unverified