Leading theories of the cuprate superconductivity: a critique

Navinder Singh

doi:10.1016/j.physc.2020.1353782

← Back to search

Leading theories of the cuprate superconductivity: a critique

Navinder Singh

arXiv:2006.06335 · DOI 10.1016/j.physc.2020.1353782 · 2020-06-11 · arXiv: Superconductivity

T4review25 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We present a review of the leading theoretical approaches in the field of cuprate high temperature superconductivity. We start out by defining the problem and ask the question: whether an overarching theory possible (which is capable of explaining not only the mechanism of unconventional superconductivity but also a coherent understanding of the strange metal phase and the pseudogap phase)? If it is possible, what should we expect from the overarching theory? We list various experimental facts, and point out what can we learn from them and where do current theories stand in addressing them? Next, we present a critique of the current leading approaches. We conclude that although progress in the field has been unprecedented, but we still lack a coherent understanding.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

Formula	Reported Tc (K)	Pressure (GPa)	Type
YBa2Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	90	Pressure not reported	unknown
La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	40	Pressure not reported	unknown