Comment on "Inconsistency of the conventional theory of superconductivity" by J.E. Hirsch
Denis M. Basko, Robert S. Whitney
arXiv:2006.12998 · 2020-06-23 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
J. E. Hirsch [EPL 130 (2020) 17006] claimed an inconsistency between thermodynamics and the theory of superconductivity. We argue that he overlooked a crucial term which determines the supercurrent dynamics and ensures energy conservation by providing an internal energy source for the Joule heating. Thermodynamic consistency is restored by restoring energy conservation. The correct dynamics is given by Maxwell's equations in the superconductor.
Similar papers
Inconsistency of the conventional theory of superconductivity
similarity 0.88J. E. Hirsch · 2019 · arXiv:1909.12786
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Self-consistent Ginzburg-Landau theory for transport currents in superconductors
similarity 0.88M. Ogren et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1111.1314
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evanescent states and non-equilibrium in driven superconducting nanowires
similarity 0.87N. Vercruyssen et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1202.2588
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fluctuation and gauge effects on the critical behavior of superconductors
similarity 0.87Diana V. Shopova & Dimo I. Uzunov · 2007 · arXiv:cond-mat/0701266
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase transitions in the domain structure of ferromagnetic superconductors
similarity 0.87I. M. Khaymovich et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1401.2806
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superheating field of superconductors within Ginzburg-Landau theory
similarity 0.87Mark K. Transtrum et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1008.4553
Source status unknown — claims are unverified