Miniaturization of the Superconducting Memory Cell via a Three-Dimensional Nb Nano-Superconducting Quantum Interference Device
Lei Chen, Lili Wu, Yue Wang, Yinping Pan, Denghui Zhang, Junwen Zeng, Xiaoyu Liu, Linxian Ma, Wei Peng, Yihua Wang, Jie Ren, Zhen Wang
arXiv:2007.11734 · DOI 10.1021/acsnano.0c04405 · 2020-07-23
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Scalable memories that can match the speeds of superconducting logic circuits have long been desired to enable a superconducting computer. A superconducting loop that includes a Josephson junction can store a flux quantum state in picoseconds. However, the requirement for the loop inductance to create a bi-state hysteresis sets a limit on the minimal area occupied by a single memory cell. Here, we present a miniaturized superconducting memory cell based on a Three-Dimensional (3D) Nb nano-Superconducting QUantum Interference Device (nano-SQUID). The major cell area here fits within an 8*9 μm^2 rectangle with a cross-selected function for memory implementation. The cell shows periodic tunable hysteresis between two neighbouring flux quantum states produced by bias current sweeping because of the large modulation depth of the 3D nano-SQUID (~66%). Furthermore, the measured Current-Phase Relations (CPRs) of nano-SQUIDs are shown to be skewed from a sine function, as predicted by theoretical modelling. The skewness and the critical current of 3D nano-SQUIDs are linearly correlated. It is also found that the hysteresis loop size is in a linear scaling relationship with the CPR skewness using the statistics from characterisation of 26 devices. We show that the CPR skewness range of π/4~3π/4 is equivalent to a large loop inductance in creating a stable bi-state hysteresis for memory implementation. Therefore, the skewed CPR of 3D nano-SQUID enables further superconducting memory cell miniaturization by overcoming the inductance limitation of the loop area.
Similar papers
Mesoscopic superconducting memory based on bistable magnetic textures
similarity 0.88R. Fermin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single-Charge Transistor Based on the Charge-Phase Duality of a Superconducting Nanowire Circuit
similarity 0.85T. T. Hongisto & A. B. Zorin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nanobridge SQUIDs as multilevel memory elements
similarity 0.85Davi A. D. Chaves et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.08050
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hybrid superconducting-magnetic memory device using competing order parameters
similarity 0.84Burm Baek et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1310.2201
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Symmetry of the critical current function in superconducting nanodevices
similarity 0.84Ziqi Zhao et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2606.14051
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetoresistance Oscillations in Granular Superconducting Niobium Nitride Nanowires
similarity 0.83U. Patel et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0907.2468
Source status unknown — claims are unverified