← Back to search

Analysis of the Ghost and Mirror Fields in the Nernst Signal Induced by Superconducting Fluctuations

A. Glatz, A. Pourret, A. A. Varlamov

arXiv:2007.15865 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.174507 · 2020-07-31

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We present a complete analysis of the Nernst signal due to superconducting fluctuations in a large variety of superconductors from conventional to unconventional ones. A closed analytical expression of the fluctuation contribution to the Nernst signal is obtained in a large range of temperature and magnetic field. We apply this expression directly to experimental measurements of the Nernst signal in Nb$_x$Si$_{1-x}$ thin films and a URu$_2$Si$_2$ superconductors. Both magnetic field and temperature dependence of the available data are fitted with very good accuracy using only two fitting parameters, the superconducting temperature $T_{\mathrm{c0}}$ and the upper critical field $H_{\mathrm{c2}}$. The obtained values agree very well with experimentally obtained values. We also extract the ghost lines (maximum of the Nernst signal for constant temperature or magnetic field) from the complete expression and also compare it to several experimentally obtained curves. Our approach predicts a linear temperature dependence for the ghost critical field well above $T_{\mathrm{c0}}$. Within the errors of the experimental data, this linearity is indeed observed in many superconductors far from $T_{\mathrm{c0}}$.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
NbxSi1-x

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
URu2Si2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers