Analysis of the Ghost and Mirror Fields in the Nernst Signal Induced by Superconducting Fluctuations
A. Glatz, A. Pourret, A. A. Varlamov
arXiv:2007.15865 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.174507 · 2020-07-31
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a complete analysis of the Nernst signal due to superconducting fluctuations in a large variety of superconductors from conventional to unconventional ones. A closed analytical expression of the fluctuation contribution to the Nernst signal is obtained in a large range of temperature and magnetic field. We apply this expression directly to experimental measurements of the Nernst signal in Nb$_x$Si$_{1-x}$ thin films and a URu$_2$Si$_2$ superconductors. Both magnetic field and temperature dependence of the available data are fitted with very good accuracy using only two fitting parameters, the superconducting temperature $T_{\mathrm{c0}}$ and the upper critical field $H_{\mathrm{c2}}$. The obtained values agree very well with experimentally obtained values. We also extract the ghost lines (maximum of the Nernst signal for constant temperature or magnetic field) from the complete expression and also compare it to several experimentally obtained curves. Our approach predicts a linear temperature dependence for the ghost critical field well above $T_{\mathrm{c0}}$. Within the errors of the experimental data, this linearity is indeed observed in many superconductors far from $T_{\mathrm{c0}}$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbxSi1-x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| URu2Si2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Analysis of the ghost and mirror fields in the Nernst signal induced by superconducting fluctuations
similarity 1.00A. Glatz et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of thermal fluctuations on the Nernst signal in superconducting (K,Ba)BiO3 single crystals
similarity 0.89T. Klein et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nernst effect as a probe of superconducting fluctuations in disordered thin films
similarity 0.89A. Pourret et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0902.2732
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting fluctuations and the Nernst effect: A diagrammatic approach
similarity 0.88Iddo Ussishkin · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0211384
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nernst effect beyond the coherence critical field of a nanoscale granular superconductor
similarity 0.88S. Lerer et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Temperature-tuned Fermi-surface topology and segmentation in noncentrosymmetric superconductors
similarity 0.86Madhuparna Karmakar
Source status unknown — claims are unverified