Magnetic versus nonmagnetic superconducting states in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$
V. P. Mineev
arXiv:2009.03263 · 2020-09-02
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The measurements of intensity of ultrasonic resonances below the transition to the superconducting state in a tetragonal metal cannot distinguish between the magnetic and nonmagnetic superconducting states with two-component order parameters.
Similar papers
Polarized-Neutron Scattering Study of the Cooper-Pair Moment in Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.89J. A. Duffy et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of a Large Superconductivity-Induced Gap in Magnetic Fluctuations of Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.88S. Kunkemöller et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous magnetic fluctuations in superconducting Sr2RuO4 revealed by Ru101 nuclear spin-spin relaxation
similarity 0.87Masahiro Manago et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ultrasound evidence for a two-component superconducting order parameter in SrRuO
similarity 0.86S. Benhabib et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2002.05916
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Normal state O NMR studies of SrRuO under uniaxial stress
similarity 0.86Yongkang Luo et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1810.01209
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Inelastic neutron scattering study of magnetic excitations in SrRuO
similarity 0.85M. Braden et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0206304
Source status unknown — claims are unverified