Andreev-Coulomb Drag in Coupled Quantum Dots
S. Mojtaba Tabatabaei, David Sanchez, Alfredo Levy Yeyati, Rafael Sanchez
arXiv:2009.12398 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.247701 · 2020-09-25 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The Coulomb drag effect has been observed as a tiny current induced by both electron-hole asymmetry and interactions in normal coupled quantum dot devices. In the present work we show that the effect can be boosted by replacing one of the normal electrodes by a superconducting one. Moreover, we show that at low temperatures and for sufficiently strong coupling to the superconducting lead, the Coulomb drag is dominated by Andreev processes, is robust against details of the system parameters and can be controlled with a single gate voltage. This mechanism can be distinguished from single-particle contributions by a sign inversion of the drag current.
Similar papers
Andreev-Coulomb Drag in Coupled Quantum Dots
similarity 0.92S. Mojtaba Tabatabaei et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Odd-triplet superconductivity in single-level quantum dots
similarity 0.89S. Weiss & J. König · 2017 · arXiv:1707.01791
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of Andreev Blockade in a Double Quantum Dot with a Superconducting Lead
similarity 0.88David Pekker et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1810.05112
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlocal quantum heat engines made of hybrid superconducting devices
similarity 0.88S. Mojtaba Tabatabaei et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2207.06480
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Time-dependent Andreev bound states of a quantum dot coupled to two superconducting leads
similarity 0.88R. Taranko et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1812.02153
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Non-local Andreev transport through an interacting quantum dot
similarity 0.88David Futterer et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0806.0237
Source status unknown — claims are unverified