Singular magnetic anisotropy in the nematic phase of FeSe
R. Zhou, D. D. Scherer, H. Mayaffre, P. Toulemonde, M. Ma, Y. Li, B. M. Andersen, M. -H. Julien
arXiv:2010.01020 · DOI 10.1038/s41535-020-00295-1 · 2020-10-02 · npj Quantum Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
FeSe is arguably the simplest, yet the most enigmatic, iron-based superconductor. Its nematic but non-magnetic ground state is unprecedented in this class of materials and stands out as a current puzzle. Here, our NMR measurements in the nematic state of mechanically detwinned FeSe reveal that both the Knight shift and the spin-lattice relaxation rate 1/T_1 possess an in-plane anisotropy opposite to that of the iron pnictides LaFeAsO and BaFe2As2. Using a microscopic electron model that includes spin-orbit coupling, our calculations show that an opposite quasiparticle weight ratio between the d_xz and d_yz orbitals leads to an opposite anisotropy of the orbital magnetic susceptibility, which explains our Knight shift results. We attribute this property to a different nature of nematic order in the two compounds, predominantly bond-type in FeSe and onsite ferro-orbital in pnictides. The T_1 anisotropy is found to be inconsistent with existing neutron scattering data in FeSe, showing that the spin fluctuation spectrum reveals surprises at low energy, possibly from fluctuations that do not break C_4 symmetry. Therefore, our results reveal that important information is hidden in these anisotropies and they place stringent constraints on the low-energy spin correlations as well as on the nature of nematicity in FeSe.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Pressure Induced Stripe-order Antiferromagnetism and First-order Phase Transition in FeSe
similarity 0.91P. S. Wang et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1603.04589
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
NMR evidence for static local nematicity and its cooperative interplay with low-energy magnetic fluctuations in FeSe under pressure
similarity 0.90P. Wiecki et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1711.00936
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Origin of the tetragonal-to-orthorhombic (nematic) phase transition in FeSe: a combined thermodynamic and NMR study
similarity 0.90A. E. Böhmer et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1407.5497
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Orbital selectivity enhanced by nematic order in FeSe
similarity 0.90Rong Yu et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1803.01733
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-Orbital-Intertwined Nematic State in FeSe
similarity 0.89J. Li et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1903.05798
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Momentum Dependence of the Nematic Order Parameter in Iron-Based Superconductors
similarity 0.89H. Pfau et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1908.02790
Source status unknown — claims are unverified