← Back to search

Electronic correlations and magnetic interactions in infinite-layer NdNiO$_2$

Vamshi M. Katukuri, Nikolay A. Bogdanov, Oskar Weser, Jeroen van den Brink, Ali Alavi

arXiv:2012.11179 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.241112 · 2020-12-21 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical21 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The large antiferromagnetic exchange coupling in the parent high-$T_{\rm c}$ cuprate superconductors is believed to play a crucial role in pairing the superconducting carriers. The recent observation of superconductivity in hole-doped infinite-layer (IL-) NdNiO$_2$ brings to the fore the relevance of magnetic coupling in high-$T_{\rm c}$ superconductors, particularly because no magnetic ordering is observed in the undoped IL-NdNiO$_2$ unlike in parent copper oxides. Here, we investigate the electronic structure and the nature of magnetic exchange in IL-NdNiO$_2$ using state-of-the-art many-body quantum chemistry methods. From a systematic comparison of the electronic and magnetic properties with isostructural cuprate IL-CaCuO$_2$, we find that the on-site dynamical correlations are significantly stronger in IL-NdNiO$_2$ compared to the cuprate analog. These dynamical correlations play a critical role in the magnetic exchange resulting in an unexpectedly large antiferromagnetic nearest neighbor isotropic $J$ of 77 meV between the Ni$^{1+}$ ions within the $ab$-plane. While we find many similarities in the electronic structure between the nickelate and the cuprate, the role of electronic correlations is profoundly different in the two. We further discuss the implications of our findings in understanding the origin of superconductivity in nickelates.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

15Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers