← Back to search

Van der Waals Ferromagnetic Josephson Junctions

Linfeng Ai, Enze Zhang, Ce Huang, Xiaoyi Xie, Yunkun Yang, Zehao Jia, Yuda Zhang, Shanshan Liu, Zihan Li, Pengliang Leng, Xingdan Sun, Xufeng Kou, Zheng Han, Faxian Xiu

arXiv:2101.04323 · DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-26946-w · 2021-01-12

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Superconductor-ferromagnet (S-F) interfaces in two-dimensional (2D) heterostructures present a unique opportunity to study the interplay between superconductivity and ferromagnetism. The realization of such nanoscale heterostructures in van der Waals (vdW) crystals remains largely unexplored due to the challenge of making an atomically-sharp interface from their layered structures. Here, we build a vdW ferromagnetic Josephson junction (JJ) by inserting a few-layer ferromagnetic insulator Cr2Ge2Te6 into two layers of superconductor NbSe2. Owing to the remanent magnetic moment of the barrier, the critical current and the corresponding junction resistance exhibit a hysteretic and oscillatory behavior against in-plane magnetic fields, manifesting itself as a strong Josephson coupling state. Through the control of this hysteresis, we can effectively trace the magnetic properties of atomic Cr2Ge2Te6 in response to the external magnetic field. Also, we observe a central minimum of critical current in some thick JJ devices, evidencing the coexistence of 0 and π phase coupling in the junction region. Our study paves the way to exploring the sensitive probes of weak magnetism and multifunctional building blocks for phase-related superconducting circuits with the use of vdW heterostructures.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
NbSe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers