The role of the nominal iron content in the structural, compositional and physical properties of BaFe$_{2+δ}$S$_3$
M. L. Amigó, Q. Stahl, A. Maljuk, A. U. B. Wolter, C. Hess, J. Geck, S. Wurmehl, S. Seiro, B. Büchner
arXiv:2101.07823 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.094801 · 2021-01-19
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
BaFe$_2$S$_3$ is a quasi-one-dimensional antiferromagnetic insulator that becomes superconducting under hydrostatic pressure. The magnetic ordering temperature, $T_N$, as well as the presence of superconductivity have been found to be sample dependent. It has been argued that the Fe content may play a decisive role, with the use of 5%mol excess Fe being reportedly required during the synthesis to optimize the magnetic ordering temperature and the superconducting properties. However, it is yet unclear whether an Fe off-stoichiometry is actually present in the samples, and how it affects the structural, magnetic and transport properties. Here, we present a systematic study of compositional, structural and physical properties of BaFe$_{2+δ}$S$_3$ as a function of the nominal Fe excess $δ$. As $δ$ increases, we observe the presence of an increasing fraction of secondary phases but no systematic change in the composition or crystal structure of the main phase. Magnetic susceptibility curves are influenced by the presence of magnetic secondary phases. The previously reported maximum of $T_N$ at $δ$=0.1 was not confirmed. Samples with nominal $δ$=0 present the lowest $T_N$ and the resistivity anomaly at the highest temperature $T^*$ while, for $δ\geq 0.05$, both quantities and the transport gap are seemingly $δ$-independent. Finally, we show that crystals free of ferromagnetic spurious phases can be obtained by remelting samples with nominal $δ$=0.05 in a Bridgman process.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| BaFe2S3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 24 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BaFe2Se3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Bandwidth controlled insulator-metal transition in BaFeS: A Mössbauer study under pressure
similarity 0.91Philipp Materne et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1810.11269
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dichotomy Between Orbital and Magnetic Nematic Instabilities in BaFe2S3
similarity 0.88Suguru Hosoi et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2011.08600
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gradual Enhancement of Stripe-Type Antiferromagnetism in Spin Ladder Material BaFeS Under Pressure
similarity 0.88Liangliang Zheng et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1807.10703
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electrodynamics of BaFe2As2 from infrared measurements under pressure
similarity 0.87L. Baldassarre et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1306.1352
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The magnetic precursor of the pressure-induced superconductivity in Fe-ladder compound
similarity 0.87Songxue Chi et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1606.09223
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A new family of iron pnictides: BaFeAs2 and BaFeSb2
similarity 0.87J. H. Shim et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0809.0041
Source status unknown — claims are unverified