Cross-dimensional universality classes in static and periodically driven Kitaev models
Paolo Molignini, Albert Gasull Celades, R. Chitra, Wei Chen
arXiv:2102.00009 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.184507 · 2021-01-29
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The Kitaev model on the honeycomb lattice is a paradigmatic system known to host a wealth of nontrivial topological phases and Majorana edge modes. In the static case, the Majorana edge modes are nondispersive. When the system is periodically driven in time, such edge modes can disperse and become chiral. We obtain the full phase diagram of the driven model as a function of the coupling and the driving period. We characterize the quantum criticality of the different topological phase transitions in both the static and driven model via the notions of Majorana-Wannier state correlation functions and momentum-dependent fidelity susceptibilities. We show that the system hosts cross-dimensional universality classes: although the static Kitaev model is defined on a 2D honeycomb lattice, its criticality falls into the universality class of 1D linear Dirac models. For the periodically driven Kitaev model, besides the universality class of prototype 2D linear Dirac models, an additional 1D nodal loop type of criticality exists owing to emergent time-reversal and mirror symmetries, indicating the possibility of engineering multiple universality classes by periodic driving. The manipulation of time-reversal symmetry allows the periodic driving to control the chirality of the Majorana edge states.
Similar papers
Time reversal non-invariant non-Abelian topological order in non-centrosymmetric superconductors
similarity 0.89Parag Ghosh et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1006.3083
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fractionalized Fermi liquids and exotic superconductivity in the Kitaev-Kondo lattice
similarity 0.89Urban F. P. Seifert et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.09381
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fractional Wannier Orbitals and Tight-Binding Gauge Fields for Kitaev Honeycomb Superlattices with Flat Majorana Bands
similarity 0.89K. B. Yogendra et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2407.12559
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multiband s-wave topological superconductors: role of dimensionality and magnetic field response
similarity 0.88Shusa Deng et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1303.2687
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous Josephson effect and rectification in junctions between Floquet topological superconductors
similarity 0.88Abhiram Soori · 2022 · arXiv:2208.08427
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Chiral Superconductors
similarity 0.88Kallin, Catherine & Berlinsky, John · 2016 · arXiv:1512.01151
Source status unknown — claims are unverified