Cuprate superconductors as viewed through a striped lens
J. M. Tranquada
arXiv:2102.02257 · DOI 10.1080/00018732.2021.1935698 · 2021-02-03 · Advances in Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Understanding the electron pairing in hole-doped cuprate superconductors has been a challenge, in particular because the "normal" state from which it evolves is unprecedented. Now, after three and a half decades of research, involving a wide range of experimental characterizations, it is possible to delineate a clear and consistent cuprate story. It starts with doping holes into a charge-transfer insulator, resulting in in-gap states. These states exhibit a pseudogap resulting from the competition between antiferromagnetic superexchange $J$ between nearest-neighbor Cu atoms (a real-space interaction) and the kinetic energy of the doped holes, which, in the absence of interactions, would lead to extended Bloch-wave states whose occupancy is characterized in reciprocal space. To develop some degree of coherence on cooling, the spin and charge correlations must self-organize in a cooperative fashion. A specific example of resulting emergent order is that of spin and charge stripes, as observed in La$_{2-x}$Ba$_x$CuO$_4$. While stripe order frustrates bulk superconductivity, it nevertheless develops pairing and superconducting order of an unusual character. The antiphase order of the spin stripes decouples them from the charge stripes, which can be viewed as hole-doped, two-leg, spin-$\frac12$ ladders. To achieve superconducting order, the pair correlations in neighboring ladders must develop phase order. In the presence of spin stripe order, antiphase Josephson coupling can lead to pair-density-wave superconductivity. Alternatively, in-phase superconductivity requires that the spin stripes have an energy gap, which empirically limits the coherent superconducting gap. Hence, superconducting order in the cuprates involves a compromise between the pairing scale, which is maximized at $x\sim\frac18$, and phase coherence, which is optimized at $x\sim0.2$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O6.6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 61 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 75 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 75 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Theory of Intertwined Orders in High Temperature Superconductors
similarity 0.93Eduardo Fradkin et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1407.4480
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Signatures of orbital loop currents in the spatially resolved local density of states
similarity 0.92W. H. P. Nielsen et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1203.1181
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Variational Monte Carlo study of stripes as a function of doping in the Hubbard model
similarity 0.92Antonio Lechiara et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.02073
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity from charge order in cuprates
similarity 0.91J. M. Tranquada et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.03421
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Metallic and insulating stripes and their relation with superconductivity in the doped Hubbard model
similarity 0.91Luca F. Tocchio et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1905.02658
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing, Pseudogap and Fermi Arcs in Cuprates
similarity 0.91Adam Kaminski et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1403.0492
Source status unknown — claims are unverified