Evidence of Andreev blockade in a double quantum dot coupled to a superconductor
Po Zhang, Hao Wu, Jun Chen, Sabbir A. Khan, Peter Krogstrup, David Pekker, Sergey M. Frolov
arXiv:2102.03283 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.046801 · 2021-02-05 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We design and investigate an experimental system capable of entering an electron transport blockade regime in which a spin-triplet localized in the path of current is forbidden from entering a spin-singlet superconductor. To stabilize the triplet a double quantum dot is created electrostatically near a superconducting lead in an InAs nanowire. The dots are filled stochastically with electrons of either spin. The superconducting lead is a molecular beam epitaxy grown Al shell. The shell is etched away over a wire segment to make room for the double dot and the normal metal gold lead. The quantum dot closest to the normal lead exhibits Coulomb diamonds, the dot closest to the superconducting lead exhibits Andreev bound states and an induced gap. The experimental observations compare favorably to a theoretical model of Andreev blockade, named so because the triplet double dot configuration suppresses Andreev reflections. Observed leakage currents can be accounted for by finite temperature. We observe the predicted quadruple level degeneracy points of high current and a periodic conductance pattern controlled by the occupation of the normal dot. Even-odd transport asymmetry is lifted with increased temperature and magnetic field. This blockade phenomenon can be used to study spin structure of superconductors. It may also find utility in quantum computing devices that utilize Andreev or Majorana states.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.32 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Signatures of Andreev Blockade in a Double Quantum Dot Coupled to a Superconductor
similarity 0.93Po Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of Andreev Blockade in a Double Quantum Dot with a Superconducting Lead
similarity 0.91David Pekker et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1810.05112
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Creation of nonlocal spin-entangled electrons via Andreev tunneling, Coulomb blockade and resonant transport
similarity 0.90Patrik Recher & Daniel Loss · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0205484
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev Molecules in Semiconductor Nanowire Double Quantum Dots
similarity 0.89Zhaoen Su et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1611.00727
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Triple Andreev dot chains in semiconductor nanowires
similarity 0.89Hao Wu et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2105.08636
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev quantum dot with several conducting channels
similarity 0.89I. A. Sadovskyy et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1201.2831
Source status unknown — claims are unverified