Concomitant appearance of conductivity and superconductivity in (111)LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface with metal capping
R. S. Bisht, M. Mograbi, P. K. Rout, G. Tuvia, Y. Dagan, Hyeok Yoon, A. G. Swartz, H. Y. Hwang, L. L. Li, R. Pentcheva
arXiv:2102.07239 · 2021-02-14
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In polar-oxide interfaces, a certain number of monolayers (ML) is needed for conductivity to appear. This threshold for conductivity is explained by accumulating sufficient electric potential to initiate charge transfer to the interface. Here we study experimentally and theoretically the (111) SrTiO3/LaAlO3 interface where a critical thickness, tc, of nine epitaxial LaAlO3 ML is required to turn the interface from insulating to conducting and even superconducting. We show that tc decreases to 3ML when depositing a cobalt over-layer (capping) and 6ML for platinum capping. The latter result contrasts with the (100) interface, where platinum capping increases tc beyond the bare interface. The observed threshold for conductivity for the bare and the metal-capped interfaces is confirmed by our density functional theory calculations. Interestingly, for (111) SrTiO3/LaAlO3/Metal interfaces, conductivity appears concomitantly with superconductivity in contrast with the (100) SrTiO3/LaAlO3/Metal interfaces where tc is smaller than the critical thickness for superconductivity. We attribute this dissimilarity to the different orbital polarization of e'g for the (111) versus dxy for the (001) interface.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| SrTiO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| SrTiO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
Similar papers
Concomitant appearance of conductivity and superconductivity in (111) LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface with metal capping
similarity 0.90R. S. Bisht et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay of spin-orbit coupling and trigonal crystal field enhances superconductivity in (111)
similarity 0.88Long Cheng et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2511.15526
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-dimensional superconductivity at the (111)LaAlO/SrTiO interface
similarity 0.88A. M. R. V. L. Monteiro et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1703.04742
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Linear temperature dependence of the upper critical field across the dome of the LaAlO3−SrTiO3 interface superconductor
similarity 0.88L. Kuerten et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-gap s±-wave superconductivity at an oxide interface
similarity 0.88G. Singh et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Local electronic structures on the superconducting interface
similarity 0.88Bin Liu & Xiao Hu · 2010 · arXiv:1003.4370
Source status unknown — claims are unverified