Exploration of the Hg-based cuprate superconductors by Raman spectroscopy under hydrostatic pressure
N. Auvray, B. Loret, S. Chibani, R. Grasset, Y. Guarnelli, P. Parisiades, A. Forget, D. Colson, M. Cazayous, Y. Gallais, Alain Sacuto
arXiv:2102.13432 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.195130 · 2021-02-26
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The superconducting phase of the $\mathrm{HgBa}_2\mathrm{CuO}_{4+δ}$ (Hg-1201) and $\mathrm{HgBa}_2\mathrm{Ca}_2\mathrm{Cu}_3\mathrm{O}_{8+δ}$ (Hg-1223) cuprates has been investigated by Raman spectroscopy under hydrostatic pressure. Our analysis reveals that the increase of $T_c$ with pressure is slower in Hg-1223 cuprate compared to the Hg-1201 due to a charge carrier concentration imbalance (accentuated by pressure) between the $\mathrm{CuO}_2$ layers of Hg-1223. We find that the energy variation under pressure of the apical oxygen mode from which the charge carriers are transferred to the $\mathrm{CuO}_2$ layers, is the same for both the Hg-1223 and Hg-1223 cuprates and it is controlled by the inter-layer compressibility. At last, we show that the binding energy of the Cooper pairs related to the maximum amplitude of the $d-$ wave superconducting gap at the anti-nodes, does not follow $T_c$ with pressure. It decreases while $T_c$ increases. In the particular case of Hg-1201, the binding energy collapses from 10 to 2 $K_B T_c$ as the pressure increases up to 10 GPa. These direct spectroscopic observations joined to the fact that the binding energy of the Cooper pairs at the anti-nodes does not follow $T_c$ either with doping, raises the question of its link with the pseudogap energy scale which follows the same trend with doping.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| HgBa2CuO4+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 92 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 132 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
Similar papers
Exploration of Hg-based cuprate superconductors by Raman spectroscopy under hydrostatic pressure
similarity 0.91N. Auvray et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic Raman Scattering in copper oxide Superconductors: Understanding the Phase Diagram
similarity 0.90A. Sacuto et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1103.5675
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Intimate link between Charge Density Wave, Pseudogap and Superconducting Energy Scales in Cuprates
similarity 0.90B. Loret et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1808.08198
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strain-induced structural change and nearly-commensurate diffuse scattering in the model high-temperature superconductor HgBaCuO
similarity 0.90Mai Ye et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2510.21343
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Growth and characterization of HgBa2CaCu2O6+d and HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+d crystals
similarity 0.89Lichen Wang et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1807.08954
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Raman Scattering in Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.89T. P. Devereaux & A. P. Kampf · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9702186
Source status unknown — claims are unverified