Nodal superconducting gap in LiFeP revealed by NMR: contrast with LiFeAs
A. F. Fang, R. Zhou, H. Tukada, J. Yang, Z. Deng, X. C. Wang, C. Q. Jin, Guo-qing Zheng
arXiv:2103.02991 · DOI 10.1088/1674-1056/abec37 · 2021-03-04 · Chinese Physics B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Identifying the uniqueness of FeP-based superconductors may shed new lights on the mechanism of superconductivity in iron-pnictides. Here, we report nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR) studies on LiFeP and LiFeAs which have the same crystal structure but different pnictogen atoms. The NMR spectrum is sensitive to inhomogeneous magnetic fields in the vortex state and can provide the information on the superconducting pairing symmetry through the temperature dependence of London penetration depth $λ_L$. We find that $λ_L$ saturates below $T \sim 0.2$ $T_c$ in LiFeAs, where $T_c$ is the superconducting transition temperature, indicating nodeless superconducting gaps. Furthermore, by using a two-gaps model, we simulate the temperature dependence of $λ_L$ and obtain the superconducting gaps of LiFeAs, as $Δ_1 = 1.2$ $k_B T_c$ and $Δ_2 = 2.8$ $k_B T_c$, in agreement with previous result from spin-lattice relaxation. For LiFeP, in contrast, the London penetration depth $λ_L$ does not show any saturation down to $T \sim 0.03 $ $T_c$, indicating nodes in the superconducting energy gap function. Finally, we demonstrate that the strong spin fluctuations with diffusive characteristics exist in LiFeP, as in some cuprate high temperature superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiFeP Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Progressive slowing down of spin fluctuations in underdoped LaFeAsOF
similarity 0.90F. Hammerath et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1307.3138
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nodeless vs nodal order parameters in LiFeAs and LiFeP superconductors
similarity 0.89K. Hashimoto et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1107.4505
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superfluid density and penetration depth in Fe-pnictides
similarity 0.89A. B. Vorontsov et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0901.0719
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The superconducting gaps in LiFeAs: Joint study of specific heat and ARPES
similarity 0.89U. Stockert et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1011.4246
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optical investigations of the chemical pressurized EuFe2(As1-xPx)2: an s-wave superconductor with strong interband interaction
similarity 0.89D. Wu et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1011.1207
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Normal state spin dynamics in the iron-pnictide superconductors BaFe2(As1-xPx)2 and Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2 probed with NMR measurements
similarity 0.89Y. Nakai et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1305.2656
Source status unknown — claims are unverified