Unsplit superconducting and time reversal symmetry breaking transitions in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ under hydrostatic pressure and disorder
Vadim Grinenko, Debarchan Das, Ritu Gupta, Bastian Zinkl, Naoki Kikugawa, Yoshiteru Maeno, Clifford W. Hicks, Hans-Henning Klauss, Manfred Sigrist, Rustem Khasanov
arXiv:2103.03600 · DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-24176-8 · 2021-03-05 · Nature Communications
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
There is considerable evidence that the superconducting state of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ breaks time reversal symmetry. In the experiments showing time reversal symmetry breaking its onset temperature, $T_\text{TRSB}$, is generally found to match the critical temperature, $T_\text{c}$, within resolution. In combination with evidence for even parity, this result has led to consideration of a $d_{xz} \pm id_{yz}$ order parameter. The degeneracy of the two components of this order parameter is protected by symmetry, yielding $T_\text{TRSB} = T_\text{c}$, but it has a hard-to-explain horizontal line node at $k_z=0$. Therefore, $s \pm id$ and $d \pm ig$ order parameters are also under consideration. These avoid the horizontal line node, but require tuning to obtain $T_\text{TRSB} \approx T_\text{c}$. To obtain evidence distinguishing these two possible scenarios (of symmetry-protected versus accidental degeneracy), we employ zero-field muon spin rotation/relaxation to study pure Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ under hydrostatic pressure, and Sr$_{1.98}$La$_{0.02}$RuO$_4$ at zero pressure. Both hydrostatic pressure and La substitution alter $T_\text{c}$ without lifting the tetragonal lattice symmetry, so if the degeneracy is symmetry-protected $T_\text{TRSB}$ should track changes in $T_\text{c}$, while if it is accidental, these transition temperatures should generally separate. We observe $T_\text{TRSB}$ to track $T_\text{c}$, supporting the hypothesis of $d_{xz} \pm id_{yz}$ order.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| Sr1.98La0.02RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| Sr1.98La0.02RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
Similar papers
Spectroscopic signatures of time-reversal symmetry breaking superconductivity
similarity 0.94Nicholas R. Poniatowski et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2103.05641
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A proposal for reconciling diverse experiments on the superconducting state in Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.92Steven A. Kivelson et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2002.00016
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Symmetry properties of superconducting order parameter in SrRuO
similarity 0.92Anthony J. Leggett & Ying Liu · 2020 · arXiv:2010.15220
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting phase transition of Sr2RuO4 in magnetic field
similarity 0.92V. P. Mineev · 2013 · arXiv:1312.4351
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Identifying possible pairing states in SrRuO by tunneling spectroscopy
similarity 0.91Shu-Ichiro Suzuki et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1911.09453
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Surface State of Inter-orbital Pairing State in SrRuO Superconductor
similarity 0.91Satoshi Ando et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.02136
Source status unknown — claims are unverified