Evidence for competition between the superconductor proximity effect and quasiparticle spin-decay in superconducting spin-valves
B. Stoddart-Stones, X. Montiel, M. G. Blamire, J. W. A. Robinson
arXiv:2103.13368 · 2021-03-24
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The difference in the density of states for up- and down-spin electrons in a ferromagnet (F) results in spin-dependent scattering of electrons at a ferromagnet / nonmagnetic (F/N) interface. In a F/N/F spin-valve, this causes a current-independent difference in resistance ($ΔR$) between antiparallel (AP) and parallel (P) magnetization states. Giant magnetoresistance (GMR), $ΔR = R(AP) - R(P)$, is positive due to increased scattering of majority and minority spin-electrons in the AP-state. If N is substituted for a superconductor (S), there exists a competition between GMR and the superconducting spin-valve effect: in the AP-state the net magnetic exchange field acting on S is lowered and the superconductivity is reinforced meaning $R(AP)$ decreases. For current-perpendicular-to-plane (CPP) spin-valves, existing experimental studies show that GMR dominates ($ΔR>0$) over the superconducting spin valve effect ($ΔR<0$) [J. Y. Gu et al., Phys. Rev. B 66, 140507(R) (2002)]. Here, however, we report a crossover from GMR ($ΔR > 0$) to the superconducting spin valve effect ($ΔR < 0$) in CPP F/S/F spin-valves as the superconductor thickness decreases below a critical value.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Gate-Tunable Superconducting Spin Valve in a van der Waals Ferromagnet/Superconductor/Ferromagnet Trilayer
similarity 0.88A. S. Ianovskaia et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2512.09093
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effect in atomic-scaled hybrid superconductor/ferromagnet structures: crucial role of electron spectra
similarity 0.88Xavier Montiel et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0905.4212
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting spin valves based on antiferromagnet/superconductor/antiferromagnet heterostructures
similarity 0.87G. A. Bobkov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetoresistive Effects in Ferromagnet-Superconductor Multilayers
similarity 0.87E. M. Stoudenmire & C. A. R. Sá de Melo · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0412005
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-Valve Effect of the Spin Accumulation Resistance in a Double Ferromagnet - Superconductor Junction
similarity 0.87Pengshun S. Luo et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0811.4252
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin transport and magnetoresistance in F/S/F spin valves
similarity 0.87Jan Petter Morten et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0501566
Source status unknown — claims are unverified