Absence of superconductivity in the Hubbard dimer model for kappa-(BEDT-TTF)_2X
D. Roy, R. T. Clay, S. Mazumdar
arXiv:2104.01998 · DOI 10.3390/cryst11060580 · 2021-04-05
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In the most studied family of organic superconductors kappa-(BEDT-TTF)_2X, the BEDT-TTF molecules that make up the conducting planes are coupled as dimers. For some anions X, an antiferromagnetic insulator is found at low temperatures adjacent to superconductivity. With an average of one hole carrier per dimer, the BEDT-TTF band is effectively 1/2-filled. Numerous theories have suggested that fluctuations of the magnetic order can drive superconducting pairing in these models, even as direct calculations of superconducting pairing in monomer 1/2-filled band models find no superconductivity. Here we present accurate zero-temperature Density Matrix Renormalization Group (DMRG) calculations of a dimerized lattice with one hole per dimer. While we do find an antiferromagnetic state in our results, we find no evidence for superconducting pairing. This further demonstrates that magnetic fluctuations in the effective 1/2-filled band approach do not drive superconductivity in these and related materials.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| (BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | 0.03 GPa | unknown |
| (BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | 0.6 GPa | unknown |
| (BEDT-TTF)2CF3SO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Antiferromagnetism and Superconductivity in layered organic conductors: Variational cluster approach
similarity 0.90P. Sahebsara & D. Senechal · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0604057
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of long-range superconducting correlations in the frustrated half-filled-band Hubbard model
similarity 0.90S. Dayal et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and fluctuating magnetism in quasi two-dimensional kappa-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br probed with implanted muons
similarity 0.89T. Lancaster et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1007.0148
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Does the Hubbard Model Show Superconductivity?
similarity 0.89Gang Su & Masuo Suzuki · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9801243
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Paramagnetic limiting of the upper critical field of the layered organic superconductor
similarity 0.89F. Zuo et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9904186
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasi-two-dimensional organic superconductors: a review
similarity 0.89John Singleton & Charles Mielke · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0202442
Source status unknown — claims are unverified