Competing superconductivity and charge-density wave in Kagome metal CsV3Sb5: evidence from their evolutions with sample thickness
B. Q. Song, X. M. Kong, W. Xia, Q. W. Yin, C. P. Tu, C. C. Zhao, D. Z. Dai, K. Meng, Z. C. Tao, Z. J. Tu, C. S. Gong, H. C. Lei, Y. F. Guo, X. F. Yang, S. Y. Li
arXiv:2105.09248 · DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-38257-3 · 2021-05-19
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recently superconductivity and topological charge-density wave (CDW) were discovered in the Kagome metals $A$V$_3$Sb$_5$ ($A$ = Cs, Rb, and K), which have an ideal Kagome lattice of vanadium. Here we report resistance measurements on thin flakes of CsV$_3$Sb$_5$ to investigate the evolution of superconductivity and CDW with sample thickness. The CDW transition temperature ${\it T}_{\rm CDW}$ decreases from 94 K in bulk to a minimum of 82 K at thickness of 60 nm, then increases to 120 K as the thickness is reduced further to 4.8 nm (about five monolayers). Since the CDW order in CsV$_3$Sb$_5$ is quite three-dimensional (3D) in the bulk sample, the non-monotonic evolution of ${\it T}_{\rm CDW}$ with reducing sample thickness can be explained by a 3D to 2D crossover around 60 nm. Strikingly, the superconducting transition temperature ${\it T}_{\rm c}$ shows an exactly opposite evolution, increasing from 3.64 K in the bulk to a maximum of 4.28 K at thickness of 60 nm, then decreasing to 0.76 K at 4.8 nm. Such exactly opposite evolutions provide strong evidence for competing superconductivity and CDW, which helps us to understand these exotic phases in $A$V$_3$Sb$_5$ Kagome metals.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| CsV3Sb5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.64 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| CsV3Sb5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.28 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| CsV3Sb5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.76 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| CsV3Sb5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| RbV3Sb5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.92 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KV3Sb5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.93 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Double Superconducting Dome and Triple Enhancement of Tc in the Kagome Superconductor CsV3Sb5 under High Pressure
similarity 0.93K. Y. Chen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nodal superconductivity and superconducting domes in the topological Kagome metal CsV3Sb5
similarity 0.93C. C. Zhao et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2102.08356
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Emergent nematicity and intrinsic vs. extrinsic electronic scattering processes in the kagome metal CsVSb
similarity 0.93Dirk Wulferding et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2108.11690
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
s-wave superconductivity in kagome metal CsVSb revealed by Sb NQR and V NMR measurements
similarity 0.92Chao Mu et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2104.06698
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping evolution of superconductivity, charge order and band topology in hole-doped topological kagome superconductors Cs(VTi)Sb
similarity 0.92Yixuan Liu et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2110.12651
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two elementary band representation model, Fermi surface nesting, and surface topological superconductivity in VSb ()
similarity 0.92Junze Deng et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.06211
Source status unknown — claims are unverified