Kinematic Vortices induced by defects in Gapless Superconductors
Vinícius S. Souto, Elwis C. S Duarte, Edson Sardella, Rafael Zadorosny
arXiv:2105.10115 · DOI 10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127742 · 2021-05-21 · Physics Letters A
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The generalized time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (GTDGL) theory was first proposed to describe better gap superconductors and the phenomenon of thermal phase-slips (PSs) in defect-free systems. However, there is a lack of information about studies involving PSs in mesoscopic superconductors with surface defects. Thus, in this work, we simulated samples with two co-linear surface defects consisting of a lower $T_c$ superconductor narrowing the sample in its central part. The non-linear GTDGL equations were solved self-consistently under variable applied currents and by considering both gapless and gap-like superconductors. In such systems, the currents passing by the constriction induce the appearance of kinematic vortices even in the gapless sample. The dynamics always occur with a pair forming at opposite edges of the sample and annihilating in the center. It is noticed that the resistive state appears at distinct values of the applied current density for different samples, and the critical current presents a tiny difference between gapless and gap-like samples. It is worth mentioning that parameters such as the size of electrical contacts and constriction affect the critical current and the average velocity of the kinematic vortices.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| PbIn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Influence of pinning centers of different natures onsurrounding vortices
similarity 0.90Rodolfo Carvalho dos Santos et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.11688
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex configurations and metastability in mesoscopic superconductors
similarity 0.90Clécio C. de Souza Silva et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0403077
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamic metastable vortex states in interacting vortex lines
similarity 0.89Kozlov, Sergei et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.08894
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Closed vortex state in 3D mesoscopic superconducting films under an applied transport current
similarity 0.88Leonardo Rodrigues Cadorim et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.11401
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex matter in low dimensional systems with proximity induced superconductivity
similarity 0.87N. B. Kopnin et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1304.2319
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ultra-fast Kinematic Vortices in Mesoscopic Superconductors: The Effect of the Self-Field
similarity 0.87Leonardo Rodrigues Cadorim et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2006.01335
Source status unknown — claims are unverified