Designing high-performance superconductors with nanoparticle inclusions: comparisons to strong pinning theory
Sarah C. Jones, Masashi Miura, Ryuji Yoshida, Takeharu Kato, Leonardo Civale, Roland Willa, Serena Eley
arXiv:2105.10204 · DOI 10.1063/5.0057479 · 2021-05-21 · APL Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
One of the most promising routes for achieving unprecedentedly high critical currents in superconductors is to incorporate dispersed, non-superconducting nanoparticles to control the dissipative motion of vortices. However, these inclusions reduce the overall superconducting volume and can strain the interlaying superconducting matrix, which can detrimentally reduce $T_c$. Consequently, an optimal balance must be achieved between the nanoparticle density $n_p$ and size $d$. Determining this balance requires garnering a better understanding of vortex-nanoparticle interactions, described by strong pinning theory. Here, we map the dependence of the critical current on nanoparticle size and density in (Y$_{0.77}$,Gd$_{0.23}$)Ba$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-δ}$ films in magnetic fields up to 35 T, and compare the trends to recent results from time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations. We identify consistencies between the field-dependent critical current $J_c(B)$ and expectations from strong pinning theory. Specifically, we find that that $J_c \propto B^{-α}$, where $α$ decreases from $0.66$ to $0.2$ with increasing density of nanoparticles and increases roughly linearly with nanoparticle size $d/ξ$ (normalized to the coherence length). At high fields, the critical current decays faster ($\sim B^{-1}$), suggestive that each nanoparticle has captured a vortex. When nanoparticles capture more than one vortex, a small, high-field peak is expected in $J_c(B)$. Due to a spread in defect sizes, this novel peak effect remains unresolved here. Lastly, we reveal that the dependence of the vortex creep rate $S$ on nanoparticle size and density roughly mirrors that of $α$, and compare our results to low-$T$ nonlinearities in $S(T)$ that are predicted by strong pinning theory.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Y0.77Gd0.23)Ba2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Dynamic Aspects of Strong Pinning
similarity 0.91A. U. Thomann et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1110.4247
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity mediated by nematic fluctuations -- the dispersion of collective modes
similarity 0.90Kazi Ranjibul Islam & Andrey Chubukov · 2026 · arXiv:2605.05433
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory and simulations on strong pinning of vortex lines by nanoparticles
similarity 0.89Alexei E. Koshelev & Alejandro B. Kolton · 2011 · arXiv:1106.2477
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong-pinning regimes by spherical inclusions in anisotropic type-II superconductors
similarity 0.89R. Willa et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1708.01653
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Plastic vortex creep and dimensional crossovers in the highly anisotropic superconductor HgBaCuO
similarity 0.89Haley M. Cole et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.08667
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Altermagnetism-driven FFLO superconductivity in finite-filling 2D lattices
similarity 0.89Xia-Ji Liu & Hui Hu · 2026 · arXiv:2601.06735
Source status unknown — claims are unverified