← Back to search

Planar graphene-NbSe$_2$ Josephson junctions in a parallel magnetic field

Tom Dvir, Ayelet Zalic, Eirik Holm Fyhn, Morten Amundsen, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Jacob Linder, Hadar Steinberg

arXiv:2106.11662 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.115401 · 2021-06-22 · Physical Review B

T312 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Thin transition metal dichalcogenides sustain superconductivity at large in-plane magnetic fields due to Ising spin-orbit protection, which locks their spins in an out-of-plane orientation. Here we use thin NbSe$_2$ as superconducting electrodes laterally coupled to graphene, making a planar, all van der Waals two-dimensional Josephson junction (2DJJ). We map out the behavior of these novel devices with respect to temperature, gate voltage, and both out-of-plane and in-plane magnetic fields. Notably, the 2DJJs sustain supercurrent up to $H_\parallel$ as high as 8.5 T, where the Zeeman energy $E_Z$ rivals the Thouless energy $E_{Th}$, a regime hitherto inaccessible in graphene. As the parallel magnetic field $H_\parallel$ increases, the 2DJJ's critical current is suppressed and in a few cases undergoes suppression and recovery. We explore the behavior in $H_\parallel$ by considering theoretically two effects: a 0-$π$ transition induced by tuning of the Zeeman energy and the unique effect of ripples in an atomically thin layer which create a small spatially varying perpendicular component of the field. The 2DJJs have potential utility as flexible probes for two-dimensional superconductivity in a variety of materials and introduce high $H_\parallel$ as a newly accessible experimental knob.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
NbSe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers