Metallic Hydrogen: A Liquid Superconductor?
Craig M. Tenney, Zachary F. Croft, Jeffrey M. McMahon
arXiv:2107.00098 · DOI 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c05831 · 2021-06-30 · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Metallic hydrogen is expected to exhibit remarkable physics. Of particular interest in this work is the possibility of high-temperature superconductivity. Comparing calculations of the superconducting critical temperatures of the solid phase to melting temperatures over a range of pressures leads to an interesting question: Will the solid, in a superconducting state, melt to a liquid that remains a superconductor? In this work, the possibility of liquid superconductivity in metallic hydrogen is investigated. This is done by first-principles simulations, and using the results of these to solve the Eliashberg equations. These are carried out over the pressure (and temperature) conditions where molecular dissociation is expected to first occur in the solid phase. Over the pressure range $386.8(4)$--$783.7(4)$ GPa, $T_c$ increases from $308(6)$ to $372(2)$ K with a maximum uncertainty of $10$ K; it then decreases to $356(2)$ K at $883.7(3)$ GPa. Comparisons to the solid phase show that the critical temperature is not significantly changed between the two phases, though the physics behind their superconductivity is different. Careful comparisons of these values to recent results in the context of the hydrogen phase diagram show that they are higher than the melting temperatures and that the solid will melt to liquid atomic hydrogen. The results of this work (in this context) therefore suggest that liquid atomic hydrogen will indeed exist in a superconducting state. They also provide the pressure and temperature conditions over which to look for it.
Similar papers
Superconductor discovery in the emerging paradigm of Materials Informatics
similarity 0.91Huan Tran et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2510.25971
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the elements, alloys and simple compounds
similarity 0.91G. W. Webb et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1502.04724
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Machine learning the relationship between Debye temperature and superconducting transition temperature
similarity 0.90Adam D. Smith et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.12977
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revisiting the homogeneous electron gas in pursuit of the properly normed ab initio Eliashberg theory
similarity 0.90Ryosuke Akashi · 2021 · arXiv:2106.05751
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ab-initio theory of superconductivity - I: Density functional formalism and approximate functionals
similarity 0.90M. Lüders et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0408685
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Description of the thermodynamic properties of and superconductors beyond the mean-field approximation
similarity 0.89M. W. Jarosik et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1803.00325
Source status unknown — claims are unverified