Electrostatic field-driven supercurrent suppression in ionic-gated metallic Josephson nanotransistors
Federico Paolucci, Francesco Crisà, Giorgio De Simoni, Lennart Bours, Claudio Puglia, Elia Strambini, Stefano Roddaro, Francesco Giazotto
arXiv:2107.00935 · DOI 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03481 · 2021-07-02 · Nano letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recent experiments have shown the possibility of tuning the transport properties of metallic nanosized superconductors through a gate voltage. These results renewed the longstanding debate on the interaction between electrostatic fields and superconductivity. Indeed, different works suggested competing mechanisms as the cause of the effect: an unconventional electric field-effect or quasiparticle injection. Here, we provide conclusive evidence for the electrostatic-field-driven control of the supercurrent in metallic nanosized superconductors, by realizing ionic-gated superconducting field-effect nanotransistors (ISFETs) where electron injection is impossible. Our Nb ISFETs show giant suppression of the superconducting critical current of up to 45%. Moreover, the bipolar supercurrent suppression observed in different ISFETs, together with invariant critical temperature and normal-state resistance, also excludes conventional charge accumulation/depletion. Therefore, the microscopic explanation of this effect calls upon a novel theory able to describe the nontrivial interaction of static electric fields with conventional superconductivity.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7.3 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7.6 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
Similar papers
Spectroscopic Signatures of Gate-Controlled Superconducting Phases
similarity 0.90Maria Teresa Mercaldo et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2012.01490
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unveiling mechanisms of electric field effects on superconductors by a magnetic field response
similarity 0.89Lennart Bours et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microwave response of a metallic superconductor subject to a high-voltage gate electrode
similarity 0.88Giacomo Catto et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2105.08322
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interfacial control of vortex-limited critical current in type II superconductor films
similarity 0.88Marius K. Hope et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2108.04263
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the origin of the controversial electrostatic field effect in superconductors
similarity 0.87Ilia Golokolenov et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2009.00683
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gate voltage modulation of the superconducting state in a degenerate semiconductor
similarity 0.87Bikash C. Barik et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.09607
Source status unknown — claims are unverified