Physical limitations of the Hohenberg-Mermin-Wagner theorem
Grgur Palle, D. K. Sunko
arXiv:2107.09714 · DOI 10.1088/1751-8121/ac0a9d · 2021-07-20 · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The Hohenberg-Mermin-Wagner (HMW) theorem states that infrared (IR) fluctuations prevent long-range order which breaks continuous symmetries in two dimensions (2D), at finite temperatures. We note that the theorem becomes physically effective for superconductivity (SC) only for astronomical sample sizes, so it does not prevent 2D SC in practice. We systematically explore the sensitivity of the magnetic and SC versions of the theorem to finite-size and disorder effects. For magnetism, finite-size effects, disorder, and perpendicular coupling can all restore the order parameter at a non-negligible value of $T_c$ equally well, making the physical reason for finite $T_c$ sample-dependent. For SC, an alternative version of the HMW theorem is presented, in which the temperature cutoff is set by Cooper pairing, in place of the Fermi energy in the standard version. It still allows 2D SC at $2$--$3$ times the room temperature when the interaction scale is large and Cooper pairs are small, the case with high-$T_c$ SC in the cuprates. Thus IR fluctuations do not prevent 2D SC at room temperatures in samples of any reasonable size, by any known version of the HMW argument. A possible approach to derive mechanism-dependent upper bounds for SC $T_c$ is pointed out.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hf Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4000 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Hf Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.13 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 15000 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Statistical Model of Superconductivity in a 2D Binary Boson-Fermion Mixture
similarity 0.88M. Casas et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0003499
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Statistical Model of Superconductivity in a 2D Binary Boson-Fermion Mixture
similarity 0.88M. Casas et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0102243
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum confinement theory of ultra-thin films: electronic, thermal and superconducting properties
similarity 0.88Alessio Zaccone · 2025 · arXiv:2505.08696
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cooper Pairs in Alternating Layers of Light and Heavy Atoms
similarity 0.87X. H. Zheng · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0007150
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cooper pair dispersion relation for weak to strong coupling
similarity 0.87S. K. Adhikari et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0004217
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cooper pairs as resonances
similarity 0.87M. Fortes et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0103398
Source status unknown — claims are unverified