Transient dynamics of a magnetic impurity coupled to superconducting electrodes: exact numerics versus perturbation theory
R. Seoane Souto, A. E. Feiguin, A. Martín-Rodero, A. Levy Yeyati
arXiv:2108.05959 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.214506 · 2021-08-12 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Impurities coupled to superconductors offer a controlled platform to understand the interplay between superconductivity, many-body interactions, and non-equilibrium physics. In the equilibrium situation, local interactions at the impurity induce a transition between the spin-singlet to the spin-doublet ground state, resulting in a supercurrent sign reversal ($0-π$ transition). In this work, we apply the exact time-dependent density matrix renormalization group method to simulate the transient dynamics of such superconducting systems. We also use a perturbative approximation to analyze their properties at longer times. These two methods agree for a wide range of parameters. In a phase-biased situation, the system gets trapped in a metastable state characterized by a lower supercurrent compared to the equilibrium case. We show that local Coulomb interactions do not provide an effective relaxation mechanism for the initially trapped quasiparticles. In contrast, other relaxation mechanisms, such as coupling to a third normal lead, make the impurity spin relax for parameter values corresponding to the equilibrium $0$ phase. For parameters corresponding to the equilibrium $π$ phase the impurity converges to a spin-polarized stationary state. Similar qualitative behavior is found for a voltage-biased junction, which provides an effective relaxation mechanism for the trapped quasiparticles in the junction.
Similar papers
Demonstrating Majorana non-Abelian properties using fast adiabatic charge-transfer
similarity 0.95Svend Krøjer et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.11833
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
One-dimensional topological superconductivity in a van der Waals heterostructure
similarity 0.93Jose Martinez-Castro et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2304.08142
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fusion rules in a Majorana single-charge transistor
similarity 0.92R. Seoane Souto & M. Leijnse · 2021 · arXiv:2112.07472
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Bound states around impurities in a superconducting bilayer
similarity 0.92Yufei Zhu et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2212.09207
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of scanning gate microscopy imaging of the supercurrent distribution in a planar Josephson junction
similarity 0.92K. Kaperek et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.08587
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Amperean superconductivity cannot be induced by deep subwavelength cavities in a two-dimensional material
similarity 0.92Gian Marcello Andolina et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.10371
Source status unknown — claims are unverified