← Back to search

Orbital-dependent modulation of the superconducting gap in uniaxially strained Ba$_{0.6}$K$_{0.4}$Fe$_2$As$_2$

L. Chen, T. T. Han, C. Cai, Z. G. Wang, Y. D. Wang, Z. M. Xin, Y. Zhang

arXiv:2108.08986 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.L060502 · 2021-08-20 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical1 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Pairing symmetry which characterizes the superconducting pairing mechanism is normally determined by measuring the superconducting gap structure ($|Δ_k|$). Here, we report the measurement of a strain-induced gap modulation ($\partial|Δ_k|$) in uniaxially strained Ba$_{0.6}$K$_{0.4}$Fe$_2$As$_2$ utilizing angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and $in$-$situ$ strain-tuning. We found that the uniaxial strain drives Ba$_{0.6}$K$_{0.4}$Fe$_2$As$_2$ into a nematic superconducting state which breaks the four-fold rotational symmetry of the superconducting pairing. The superconducting gap increases on the $d_{yz}$ electron and hole pockets while it decreases on the $d_{xz}$ counterparts. Such orbital selectivity indicates that orbital-selective pairing exists intrinsically in non-nematic iron-based superconductors. The $d_{xz}$ and $d_{yz}$ pairing channels are balanced originally in the pristine superconducting state, but become imbalanced under uniaxial strain. Our results highlight the important role of intra-orbital scattering in mediating the superconducting pairing in iron-based superconductors. It also highlights the measurement of $\partial|Δ_k|$ as an effective way to characterize the superconducting pairing from a perturbation perspective.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

38Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers