Analytic approach to transport in superconducting junctions with arbitrary carrier density
F. Setiawan, Johannes Hofmann
arXiv:2108.10333 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043087 · 2021-08-23 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Particle transport across Josephson junctions is commonly described using a simplifying approximation (often called the Andreev approximation), which assumes that excitations are fixed at the Fermi momentum and only Andreev reflections, with no normal reflections, occur at interfaces. While this approximation is appropriate for superconductors with high carrier density (for which the chemical potential vastly exceeds the pairing gap), it breaks down for low-carrier-density superconductors, such as topological superconductors, doped semiconductors, or superfluid quantum gases. Here, we present a general $analytical$ framework for transport in superconducting junctions that does not rely on this limiting Andreev approximation. We apply our framework to describe transport in junctions between $s$-wave superconductors along the BCS-BEC crossover, which interpolates between the conventional high-carrier-density (BCS-)regime and moderate- as well as low-carrier-density regimes (unitary and BEC regimes), for which the Andreev approximation is not valid. As the system is tuned from the BCS to the BEC regime, the magnitude of a subgap current due to multiple Andreev reflections (MAR) decreases. However, nonlinearities in the current-voltage characteristic become more pronounced near the intermediate unitary limit, giving rise to sharp peaks and dips in the differential conductance with even $negative$ differential conductance at specific voltages. Microscopically, the negative differential conductance is related to the van Hove points in the band structures, at which enhanced normal reflection occurs and that become accessible only when the chemical potential is comparable to or smaller than the pairing gap. The subgap current due to MAR vanishes at a critical interaction strength on the BEC side, which we identify as the splitting point where the particle dispersion changes curvature.
Similar papers
Analytic approach to transport in superconducting junctions with arbitrary carrier density
similarity 0.89F. Setiawan & Johannes Hofmann
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phenomenology of Andreev reflection from first-principles transport theory
similarity 0.89Awadhesh Narayan et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1410.7178
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topological Andreev Rectification
similarity 0.89Pok Man Tam et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.14050
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
ac Josephson effect in asymmetric superconducting quantum point contacts
similarity 0.89Shin-Tza Wu & Sungkit Yip · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0407163
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Identifying Bogoliubov Fermi surfaces via thermoelectric response in a -wave superconductor heterostructure
similarity 0.89Amartya Pal et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.12157
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unitary limit in crossed Andreev transport
similarity 0.89I. A. Sadovskyy et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1412.8145
Source status unknown — claims are unverified