Superconducting gap symmetry from Bogoliubov quasiparticle interference analysis on {Sr}$_2${RuO}$_4$
Shinibali Bhattacharyya, Andreas Kreisel, X. Kong, T. Berlijn, Astrid T. Rømer, Brian M. Andersen, P. J. Hirschfeld
arXiv:2109.10712 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.144505 · 2021-09-22 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The nature of the superconducting order parameter in {Sr}$_2${RuO}$_4$ has generated intense interest in recent years. Since the superconducting gap is very small, high resolution methods such as scanning tunneling spectroscopy might be the best chance to directly resolve the gap symmetry. Recently, a Bogoliubov quasiparticle interference imaging (BQPI) experiment has suggested that the $d_{x^2-y^2}$ gap symmetry is appropriate for {Sr}$_2${RuO}$_4$. In this work, we use a material-specific theoretical approach based on Wannier functions of the surface of {Sr}$_2${RuO}$_4$ to calculate the continuum density of states as detected in scanning tunneling microscopy experiments. We examine several different proposed gap order parameters, and calculate the expected BQPI pattern for each case. Comparing to the available experimental data, our results suggest that a $s'+id_{xy}$ gap order parameter is the most probable state, but the measured BQPI patterns still display features unaccounted for by the theory for any of the states currently under discussion.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Spin-orbit Coupling and Multiple Phases in Spin-triplet Superconductor SrRuO
similarity 0.90Youichi Yanase et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1408.6353
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fluctuation-driven superconductivity in SrRuO from weak repulsive interactions
similarity 0.90Astrid T. Rømer & Brian M. Andersen · 2020 · arXiv:2001.11265
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Why Scanning Tunneling Microscopy on SrRuO sometimes doesn't see the superconducting gap
similarity 0.90Adrian Valadkhani et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.13106
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-triplet superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 due to orbital and spin fluctuations: Analyses by two-dimensional renormalization group theory and self-consistent vertex-correction method
similarity 0.89Masahisa Tsuchiizu et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1503.01352
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-orbit coupling and spin-triplet pairing symmetry in
similarity 0.89Zhiqiang Wang et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1911.01446
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting pairing in SrRuO from weak to intermediate coupling
similarity 0.89Li-Da Zhang et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.00010
Source status unknown — claims are unverified