Correlation between normal and superconducting states within the Fermi-liquid region of the $\textit{T-p}$ phase diagram of quantum-critical heavy-Fermion superconductors
M. ElMassalami, P. B. Castro, M. B. Silva Neto
arXiv:2109.14032 · 2021-09-28
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Extensively reported experimental observations indicate that on varying pressure ($p$) within the $\textit{T-p}$ phase diagram of most quantum critical heavy fermion (HF) superconductors, one identifies a cascade of distinct electronic states which may be magnetic, of Kondo-type, non-conventional superconducting, Fermi Liquid (FL), or non-FL character. Of particular interest to this work is the part of the phase diagram lying below a specific phase boundary, $T^{*}_\text{FL}(p^{*})$, across which the transport and thermodynamic properties switch over from non-FL into FL behavior. Remarkably, this nontrivial manifestation of FL phase is accompanied by (i) the characteristic $ρ_o + \textit{AT}^2$ dependence ($ρ_o$ = residual resistivity), (ii) a superconductivity below $T_{c} \leq T^{*}_\text{FL}(p^{*})$, and (iii) a universal scaling of $T_c$ and $A$: $ln\frac{T_{c}}θ\propto A^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ ($θ$ = characteristic energy scale). We consider that such features are driven by a fluctuation-mediated electron-electron scattering channel with the mediating quasiparticles being either spin fluctuations [Mathur et al., Nature 394,39 (1998)] or valence fluctuations [Miyake and Watanabe, Phil. Mag. 97, 3496 (2017)] depending on the character of the neighboring instability. On adopting such a scattering channel and applying standard theories of Migdal-Eliashberg (superconductivity) and Boltzmann (transport), we derive analytic expressions that satisfactorily reproduce the aforementioned empirical correlations in these heavy fermion superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| CeCoIn5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeCu2Ge2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeCu2Si2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Generalization of interlayer tunneling models to cuprate superconductors with charge density waves
similarity 0.98Hércules Santana & E. V. L. de Mello · 2022 · arXiv:2211.07370
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic superconductivity
similarity 0.97David Möckli & Murilo Kessler de Azambuja · 2024 · arXiv:2405.12298
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex state in a superconducting mesoscopic irregular octagon
similarity 0.96C. A. Aguirre et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.00886
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Efficient steady state entanglement generation in strongly driven coupled qubits
similarity 0.95Ana Laura Gramajo et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2106.12960
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ni/Bi bilayers: The effect of thickness on the superconducting properties
similarity 0.95Gabriel Sant'ana et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.10705
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fast quantum gates based on Landau-Zener-Stückelberg-Majorana transitions
similarity 0.95Joan J. Caceres et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.00601
Source status unknown — claims are unverified