Charge, bond, and pair density wave orders in a strongly correlated system
Anurag Banerjee, Catherine Pépin, Amit Ghosal
arXiv:2110.05620 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.134505 · 2021-10-11 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The coexistence of multiple quasi-degenerate orders is the hallmark of the strongly correlated materials. Experiments often reveal several spatially modulated orders in the underdoped cuprates. This has come to the forefront with the possible detection of the pair density wave states. However, microscopic calculations often struggle to stabilize such spatially modulating orders as the ground state in the strong correlation limit. This work uses the $t-t^\prime-J$-model with an additional nearest-neighbor repulsion to stabilize spatially oscillating charge, bond, and pairing orders in the underdoped regime. We employ the standard Gutzwiller approach while treating the inhomogeneity for the spatial orders using the self-consistent Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov methodology. Our calculations reveal that unidirectional bond density states coexisting with charge and pairing modulations can have lower energy than the uniform superconducting state over an extensive doping range. These modulating states vanish monotonically as the modulation wavevector becomes shorter with increased dopings. The finite momentum orders melt upon increasing doping to a vestigial nematic state which breaks the rotational symmetry of the system. The spatial features of the ground state at each doping reveal multiple wavevectors, which potentially drives the incommensuration of charge orders. Interestingly, the spatially modulating states are absent when the strong correlations criteria are relaxed, suggesting that the removal of double occupancy aids the stabilization of density wave orders.
Similar papers
The polarisation fluctuation length scale shaping the superconducting dome of SrTiO
similarity 0.95Benoît Fauqué et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2404.04154
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spectroscopic signature of spin triplet odd-valley superconductivity in two-dimensional materials
similarity 0.94T. H. Kokkeler et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2304.14849
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin Dynamics in the t-t'-J Model: Dynamical Density-Matrix Renormalization Group Study
similarity 0.93Takami Tohyama et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2003.11161
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Preparation and STM study of clean Nb(111) surfaces
similarity 0.93Julia J. Goedecke et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.04550
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonreciprocal superconducting transport and the spin Hall effect in gyrotropic structures
similarity 0.93Tim Kokkeler et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.00495
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic mechanism for fluctuating pair density wave
similarity 0.92Chandan Setty et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2110.13138
Source status unknown — claims are unverified