Distinguishing $d_{xz}+i d_{yz}$ and $d_{x^2-y^2}$ pairing in $Sr_2RuO_4$ by high magnetic field H-T phase diagrams
R. Gupta, S. Shallcross, J. Quintanilla, M. Gradhand, J. Annett
arXiv:2111.00257 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.115126 · 2021-10-30 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Employing a realistic tight-binding model describing the Fermi surface in the normal state of $Sr_2RuO_4$ we map out magnetic field versus temperature phase diagrams for $d_{x^2-y^2} (B_{1g})$ and $d_{xz}+id_{yz} (E_g)$ pairing types. Both produce (i) a similar Knight shift suppression of $\sim\!80\%$ and (ii) a bicritical point at $T=0.88$K separating low field second order phase transitions from high field Pauli limiting first order transitions. We find, however, strikingly different phase behaviour within the high field Pauli limiting region. For $d_{x^2-y^2}$ pairing symmetry an additional lower critical line of first order transitions is found (terminating in a critical point at $T=0.09-0.22$K depending on the choice of Hubbard U parameters) while for $d_{xz}+id_{yz}$ no such additional high field phase transitions are found for any choice of Hubbard U. In conjunction with our earlier finding [{\it Physical Review B} {\bf 102} (23), 235203] for $p$-wave helical pairing of a still different high field phase structure (a lower critical field line meeting the upper critical field line exactly at the bicritical point), we suggest high field Pauli limiting phase structure as a possible route to distinguish pairing symmetries in this material.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Full orbital decomposition of Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states based on first principles
similarity 0.94Tom G. Saunderson et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.00237
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Knight Shift and Leading Superconducting Instability From Spin Fluctuations in Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.93A. T. Rømer et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1905.04782
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-dimensional superconductors with intrinsic p-wave pairing or nontrivial band topology
similarity 0.93Wei Qin et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2301.11652
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Identifying possible pairing states in SrRuO by tunneling spectroscopy
similarity 0.93Shu-Ichiro Suzuki et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1911.09453
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Why Scanning Tunneling Microscopy on SrRuO sometimes doesn't see the superconducting gap
similarity 0.92Adrian Valadkhani et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.13106
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Polar Kerr Effect in Multiband Spin-Orbit Coupled Superconductors
similarity 0.92Meghdad Yazdani-Hamid et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.16623
Source status unknown — claims are unverified