Model of charge triplets for high-T$_c$ cuprates
A. S. Moskvin, Yu. D. Panov
arXiv:2111.01610 · DOI 10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.169004 · 2021-11-02 · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Starting with a minimal model for the CuO$_2$ planes with the on-site Hilbert space reduced to a charge triplet of the three effective valence centers [CuO$_4$]$^{7-,6-,5-}$ (nominally Cu$^{1+,2+,3+}$) with different conventional spin, different orbital symmetry, and different local lattice configuration, we develop a unified non-BCS spin-pseudospin model to describe the main phase states of doped cuprates. We argue that antiferromagnetic insulating, charge ordered, superconducting, and Fermi-liquid phases are possible phase states of a model parent cuprate, while typical phase state of a doped cuprate, in particular mysterious pseudogap phase, is a result of a phase separation. Superconductivity of cuprates is not a consequence of pairing of doped holes, but the result of quantum transport of on-site composite hole bosons, whereas main peculiarities of normal state can be related to an electron-hole interplay for unusual Fermi-liquid phase and features of the phase separation. Puzzlingly, but it is the electron-lattice interaction, which in the BCS model determines $s$-wave pairing, in the model of local composite bosons gives $d_{x^2-y^2}$-symmetry of the superconducting order parameter, thus showing once again a substantial involvement of the lattice in the cuprate's HTSC.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| R2CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Mirror Nesting of the Fermi Contour and Superconducting Pairing from the Repulsive Interaction
similarity 0.91V. I. Belyavsky et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0310096
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topological structures in unconventional scenario for 2D cuprates
similarity 0.91A. S. Moskvin & Yu. D. Panov · 2023 · arXiv:2301.11951
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effective-field theory for high- cuprates
similarity 0.91A. S. Moskvin & Yu. D. Panov · 2020 · arXiv:2009.12790
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudospin S=1 description of the cuprate complexity: the charge triplets model
similarity 0.90A. S. Moskvin · 2014 · arXiv:1409.6004
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
From charge transfer type insulator to superconductor
similarity 0.90Wei Guo & Rushan Han · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0303155
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Emergence of Fermi-liquid and BCS physics in overdoped cuprates
similarity 0.89B. J. Ramshaw & Steven A. Kivelson · 2026 · arXiv:2510.25767
Source status unknown — claims are unverified