Stripes in the extended $t-t^\prime$ Hubbard model: A Variational Monte Carlo analysis
Vito Marino, Federico Becca, Luca F. Tocchio
arXiv:2111.04623 · DOI 10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.6.180 · 2021-11-08 · SciPost Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
By using variational quantum Monte Carlo techniques, we investigate the instauration of stripes (i.e., charge and spin inhomogeneities) in the Hubbard model on the square lattice at hole doping $δ=1/8$, with both nearest- ($t$) and next-nearest-neighbor hopping ($t^\prime$). Stripes with different wavelengths $λ$ (denoting the periodicity of the charge inhomogeneity) and character (bond- or site-centered) are stabilized for sufficiently large values of the electron-electron interaction $U/t$. The general trend is that $λ$ increases going from negative to positive values of $t^\prime/t$ and decreases by increasing $U/t$. In particular, the $λ=8$ stripe obtained for $t^\prime=0$ and $U/t=8$ [L.F. Tocchio, A. Montorsi, and F. Becca, SciPost Phys. {\bf 7}, 21 (2019)] shrinks to $λ=6$ for $U/t\gtrsim 10$. For $t^\prime/t<0$, the stripe with $λ=5$ is found to be remarkably stable, while for $t^\prime/t>0$, stripes with wavelength $λ=12$ and $λ=16$ are also obtained. In all these cases, pair-pair correlations are highly suppressed with respect to the uniform state (obtained for large values of $|t^\prime/t|$), suggesting that striped states are not superconducting at $δ=1/8$.
Similar papers
Andreev spin-noise detector
similarity 0.93Roberto Capecelatro et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.01995
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence of controlling vortex matter via a superconducting Nanobridge
similarity 0.93C. A. Aguirre et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.15463
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Generalized Rashba Electron-Phonon Coupling and Superconductivity in Strontium Titanate
similarity 0.93Maria N. Gastiasoro et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.05753
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ab initio modeling of superconducting alloys
similarity 0.92Pedro N. Ferreira et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.15174
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Breaking through the Mermin-Wagner limit in 2D van der Waals magnets
similarity 0.92Sarah Jenkins et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.04830
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Predicting topological invariants and unconventional superconducting pairing from density of states and machine learning
similarity 0.92Flavio Noronha et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.16499
Source status unknown — claims are unverified