Optical response of Higgs mode in superconductors at clean limit
F. Yang, M. W. Wu
arXiv:2111.06128 · DOI 10.1016/j.aop.2023.169312 · 2021-11-11 · Annals of Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The phenomenological Ginzburg-Landau theory and the charge conservation directly lead to the finite Higgs-mode generation and vanishing charge-density fluctuation in the second-order optical response of superconductors at clean limit. Nevertheless, recent microscopic theoretical studies of the second-order optical response, apart from the one through the gauge-invariant kinetic equation [Yang and Wu, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 100}, 104513 (2019)], have derived a vanishing Higgs-mode generation but finite charge-density fluctuation at clean limit. We resolve this controversy by re-examining the previous derivations with the vector potential alone within the path-integral and Eilenberger-equation approaches, and show that both previous derivations contain mathematical flaws. After fixing these flaws, a finite Higgs-mode generation through the drive effect of vector potential is derived at clean limit, exactly recovering the previous result from the gauge-invariant kinetic equation as well as Ginzburg-Landau theory. By further extending the path-integral approach to include electromagnetic effects from the scalar potential and phase mode, in the second-order response, a finite contribution from the drive effect of scalar potential to the Higgs-mode generation at clean limit as well as the vanishing charge-density fluctuation are derived, also recovering the results from the gauge-invariant kinetic equation. Particularly, we show that the phase mode is excited in the second-order response, and exactly cancels the previously reported unphysical excitation of the charge-density fluctuation, guaranteeing the charge conservation.
Similar papers
Spin-resolved nonlocal transport in proximitized Rashba nanowires
similarity 0.90Paweł Szumniak et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2404.08527
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optical response of Higgs mode in superconductors at clean limit: formulation through Eilenberger equation and Ginzburg-Landau Lagrangian
similarity 0.90F. Yang & M. W. Wu · 2023 · arXiv:2301.04832
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of Retardation in the Holstein-Hubbard Model: a two-site Calculation
similarity 0.89F. Marsiglio · 2022 · arXiv:2205.10352
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Designing and topological orders in networks of Majorana bound states
similarity 0.89Fatemeh Mohammadi & Mehdi Kargarian · 2021 · arXiv:2112.06958
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theoretical analysis of anisotropic upper critical field of superconductivity in nodal-line semimetals
similarity 0.89Junya Endo et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.15864
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on "Nonlinear electromagnetic response and Higgs-mode excitation in BCS superconductors with impurities"
similarity 0.89F. Yang & M. W. Wu · 2019 · arXiv:1912.09172
Source status unknown — claims are unverified