Interpreting Angle Dependent Magnetoresistance in Layered Materials: Application to Cuprates
Seth Musser, Debanjan Chowdhury, Patrick A. Lee, T. Senthil
arXiv:2111.08740 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.125105 · 2021-11-16 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The evolution of the low temperature electronic structure of the cuprate metals from the overdoped to the underdoped side has recently been addressed through Angle-Dependant Magneto-Resistance (ADMR) experiments in La$_{1.6-x}$Nd$_{0.4}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$. The results show a striking difference between hole dopings $p = 0.24$ and $p = 0.21$ which lie on either side of a putative quantum critical point at intermediate $p$. Motivated by this, we here study the theory of ADMR in correlated layered materials, paying special attention to the role of angle dependent quasiparticle weights $Z_{\mathbf{k}}$. Such a $Z_{\mathbf{k}}$ is expected to characterize a number of popular models of the cuprate materials, particularly when underdoped. Further, in the limit of weak interlayer hopping the quasiparticle weight will affect the $c$-axis transport measured in ADMR experiments. We show that proper inclusion of the quasiparticle weight does not support an interpretation of the data in terms of a $(π, π)$ spin density wave ordered state, in agreement with the lack of direct evidence for such order. We show that a simple model of Fermi surface reconfiguring across a van Hove point captures many of the striking differences seen between $p = 0.21$ and $p = 0.24$. We comment on why such a model may be appropriate for interpreting the ADMR data, despite having a large Fermi surface at $p = 0.21$, seemingly in contradiction with other evidence for a small Fermi surafce at that doping level.
Similar papers
Calculations of quantum oscillations in cuprate superconductors considering the pseudogap
similarity 0.91E. V. L. de Mello · 2020 · arXiv:2001.07250
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stripes and electronic quasiparticles in the pseudogap state of cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.90Matthias Vojta · 2012 · arXiv:1202.1913
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum oscillations in underdoped YBa_2Cu_3O_6.5
similarity 0.89Cyril Jaudet et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1001.1508
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum oscillations suggest hidden quantum phase transition in the cuprate superconductor PrCuO
similarity 0.89Nicholas P. Breznay et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1510.04268
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Photoemission perspective on pseudogap, superconducting fluctuations, and charge order in cuprates: a review of recent progress
similarity 0.89Inna Vishik · 2018 · arXiv:1803.11228
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Extraordinary physical properties of superconducting YBaSrCuOSe in a multiphase ceramic material
similarity 0.88V. Grinenko et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.16814
Source status unknown — claims are unverified