Rising speed limits for fluxons via edge quality improvement in wide MoSi thin films
B. Budinska, B. Aichner, D. Yu. Vodolazov, M. Yu. Mikhailov, F. Porrati, M. Huth, A. V. Chumak, W. Lang, O. V. Dobrovolskiy
arXiv:2111.13431 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.034072 · 2021-11-26 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Ultra-fast vortex motion has recently become a subject of extensive investigations, triggered by the fundamental question regarding the ultimate speed limits for magnetic flux quanta and enhancements of single-photon detectors. In this regard, the current-biased quench of a dynamic flux-flow regime - flux-flow instability (FFI) - has turned into a widely used method for the extraction of information about the relaxation of quasiparticles (unpaired electrons) in the superconductor. However, the large relaxation times $τ_ε$ deduced from FFI for many superconductors are often inconsistent with the fast relaxation processes implied by their single-photon counting capability. Here, we investigate FFI in $15$ nm-thick $182$ $μ$m-wide MoSi strips with rough and smooth edges produced by laser etching and milling by a focused ion beam. For the strip with smooth edges we deduce, from the current-voltage ($I$-$V$) curve measurements, a factor of 3 larger critical currents $I_\mathrm{c}$, a factor of 20 higher maximal vortex velocities of 20 km/s, and a factor of 40 shorter $τ_ε$. We argue that for the deduction of the intrinsic $τ_ε$ of the material from the $I$-$V$ curves, utmost care should be taken regarding the edge and sample quality and such a deduction is justified only if the field dependence of $I_\mathrm{c}$ points to the dominating edge pinning of vortices.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mo70Si30 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
ac Hall Effect and Photon Drag of Superconducting Condensate
similarity 0.90S. V. Mironov et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.12656
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlinear Dynamics and Dissipation of a Curvilinear Vortex Driven by a Strong Time-Dependent Meissner Current
similarity 0.90W. P. M. R. Pathirana & A. Gurevich · 2020 · arXiv:2001.08836
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex entry conditions in type-II superconductors. Effect of surface defects
similarity 0.90D. Yu. Vodolazov et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0101074
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tuning vortex critical velocity in MoN thin films via striped magnetic domain configuration
similarity 0.89Gastón Blatter et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.18524
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fast Dynamics of Vortices in Superconductors
similarity 0.89Oleksandr V. Dobrovolskiy · 2023 · arXiv:2311.08281
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hybrid helical state and superconducting diode effect in S/F/TI heterostructures
similarity 0.89T. Karabassov et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.15608
Source status unknown — claims are unverified