Effect of Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling on supercurrent rectification and magnetochiral anisotropy of ballistic Josephson junctions
Christian Baumgartner, Lorenz Fuchs, Andreas Costa, Jordi Pico Cortes, Simon Reinhardt, Sergei Gronin, Geoffrey C. Gardner, Tyler Lindemann, Michael J. Manfra, Paulo E. Faria Junior, Denis Kochan, Jaroslav Fabian, Nicola Paradiso, Christoph Strunk
arXiv:2111.13983 · DOI 10.1088/1361-648X/ac4d5e · 2021-11-27 · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Simultaneous breaking of inversion- and time-reversal symmetry in Josephson junction leads to a possible violation of the $I(\varphi)=-I(-\varphi)$ equality for the current-phase relation. This is known as anomalous Josephson effect and it produces a phase shift $\varphi_0$ in sinusoidal current-phase relations. In ballistic Josephson junctions with non-sinusoidal current phase relation the observed phenomenology is much richer, including the supercurrent diode effect and the magnetochiral anisotropy of Josephson inductance. In this work, we present measurements of both effects on arrays of Josephson junctions defined on epitaxial Al/InAs heterostructures. We show that the orientation of the current with respect to the lattice affects the magnetochiral anisotropy, possibly as the result of a finite Dresselhaus component. In addition, we show that the two-fold symmetry of the Josephson inductance reflects in the activation energy for phase slips.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| InAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Josephson diode based on conventional superconductors and a chiral quantum dot
similarity 0.89Qiang Cheng & Qing-Feng Sun · 2023 · arXiv:2302.11144
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Sign reversal of the AC and DC supercurrent diode effect and 0--like transitions in ballistic Josephson junctions
similarity 0.88Andreas Costa et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2212.13460
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
What does the Josephson effect tell us about the superconducting state of the cuprates?
similarity 0.88R. Hlubina et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0211255
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting orbital diode effect in SN bilayers
similarity 0.88Yuriy A. Dmitrievtsev & Yakov V. Fominov · 2026 · arXiv:2604.09504
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Probing the current-phase relation of graphene Josephson junctions using microwave measurements
similarity 0.88Felix E. Schmidt et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2007.09795
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-polarized supercurrents for spintronics: a review of current progress
similarity 0.88M. Eschrig · 2015 · arXiv:1509.02242
Source status unknown — claims are unverified