Phase tuning of multiple Andreev reflections of Dirac fermions and the Josephson supercurrent in Al-MoTe2-Al junctions
Zheyi Zhu, Stephan Kim, Shiming Lei, Leslie M. Schoop, R. J. Cava, N. P. Ong
arXiv:2112.04397 · DOI 10.1073/pnas.2204468119 · 2021-12-08 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
When a normal metal $N$ is sandwiched between two superconductors, the energy gaps in the latter act as walls that confine electrons in $N$ in a square-well potential. If the voltage $V$ across $N$ is finite, an electron injected into the well undergoes multiple Andreev reflections (MAR) until it gains enough energy to overcome the energy barrier. Because each reflection converts an electron to a hole (or vice versa), while creating (or destroying) a Cooper pair, the MAR process shuttles a stream of pairs across the junction. An interesting question is, given a finite $V$, what percentage of the shuttled pairs end up as a Josephson supercurrent? This fraction does not seem to have been measured. Here we show that, in high-transparency junctions based on the type II Dirac semimetal MoTe$_2$, the MAR leads to a stair-case profile in the current-voltage ($I$-$V$) response, corresponding to pairs shuttled incoherently by the $n^{th}$-order process. By varying the phase $\varphi$ across the junction, we demonstrate that a Josephson supercurrent ${\bf J}_{\rm s}\sim \sin\varphi$ co-exists with the MAR steps, even at large $V$. The observed linear increase in the amplitude of ${\bf J}_{\rm s}$ with $n$ (for small $n$) implies that ${\bf J}_{\rm s}$ originates from the population of pairs that are coherently shuttled. We infer that the MAR steps and the supercurrent are complementary aspects of the Andreev process. The experiment yields the percentage of shuttled pairs that form the supercurrent. At large $V$, the coherent fraction is initially linear in $n$. However, as $V\to 0$ ($n\gg 1$), almost all the pairs end up as the observed Josephson supercurrent.
Similar papers
Asymmetric higher-harmonic SQUID as a Josephson diode
similarity 0.91Ya. V. Fominov & D. S. Mikhailov · 2022 · arXiv:2208.10856
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Intermodulation spectroscopy and the nonlinear response of two-level systems in superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators
similarity 0.91Janka Biznárová et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2402.10775
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong-coupling quantum thermodynamics using a superconducting flux qubit
similarity 0.90Rishabh Upadhyay et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2411.10774
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High operating temperature in V-based superconducting quantum interference proximity transistors
similarity 0.90Nadia Ligato et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1704.01284
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Titanium Nitride Film on Sapphire Substrate with Low Dielectric Loss for Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.89Hao Deng et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2205.03528
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microwave-Tunable Diode Effect in Asymmetric SQUIDs with Topological Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.89Joseph J. Cuozzo et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.16931
Source status unknown — claims are unverified