Enhanced superconductivity with possible re-appearance of charge density wave states in polycrystalline Cu$_{1-x}$Ag$_x$Ir$_2$Te$_4$ alloys
Mebrouka Boubeche, Lingyong Zeng, Xunwu Hu, Shu Guo, Yiyi He, Peifeng Yu, Yanhao Huang, Chao Zhang, Shaojuan Luo, Dao-Xin Yao, Huixia Luo
arXiv:2112.04676 · DOI 10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110539 · 2021-12-09 · Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In this study, we determined the effect of doping with the noble metal Ag on Ir$_2$Te$_4$ superconductors. Based on the resistivity, magnetization, and heat capacity, we explored the changes in the superconductivity and charge density wave for Cu$_{1-x}$Ag$_x$Ir$_2$Te$_4$ as a function of isoelectric substitution. We assessed a complete set of competing states from suppressed charge density wave in the low doping region to superconductor in the middle doping region and re-entrant charge density wave in the high doping region, thereby obtaining an electronic phase diagram, where the superconducting dome was near bipartite charge density wave regions with a maximum superconducting temperature Tc of about 2.93 K at an Ag doping level of 12%. The lower H$_{c1}$ and upper H$_{c2}$ critical magnetic fields were determined for some representative samples in the Cu$_{1-x}$Ag$_x$Ir$_2$Te$_4$ series based on magnetization and resistivity measurements, respectively. We showed that H$_{c1}$ decreased whereas H$_{c2}$ increased as the doping content increased. The specific heat anomalies at the superconducting transitions $ΔC_{el}/γT_c$ for representative samples comprising Cu$_{0.92}$Ag$_{0.08}$Ir$_2$Te$_4$, Cu$_{0.88}$Ag$_{0.12}$Ir$_2$Te$_4$, and Cu$_{0.85}$Ag$_{0.15}$Ir$_2$Te$_4$ were approximately 1.40, 1.44, and 1.42, respectively, which are all near the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer value of 1.43 and they indicate bulk superconductivity in these compounds.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu0.88Ag0.12Ir2Te4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.93 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Cu0.92Ag0.08Ir2Te4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Cu0.88Ag0.12Ir2Te4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Cu0.85Ag0.15Ir2Te4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity and Charge Density Wave of CuIr2Te4 by Iodine Doping
similarity 0.93Mebrouka Boubeche et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2101.03473
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay between Charge-Density-Wave, Superconductivity, and Ferromagnetism in CuIr2-xCrxTe4 Chalcogenides
similarity 0.89Lingyong Zeng et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.04599
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Relation between the structural phase transition and superconductivity in CuxIrTe2−ySey
similarity 0.88M. Kamitani et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence of unconventional pairing in the quasi two-dimensional CuIrTe superconductor
similarity 0.87T. Shang et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.07070
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Systematic study of (La1−xGdx)1.85Sr0.15CuO4 (0≤x≤1): Structure, superconductivity, resistivity, and magnetic properties
similarity 0.86Gang Xiao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Competition between superconductivity and charge-density waves in the pseudoternary system (Lu1−xScx)5Ir4Si10
similarity 0.86H. D. Yang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified