Temperature independent pseudogap from $^{17}$O and $^{89}$Y NMR and the single component picture
Marija Avramovska, Jakob Nachtigal, Jürgen Haase
arXiv:2112.10595 · 2021-12-20
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) is a powerful local quantum probe of the electronic structure of materials, but in the absence of reliable theory the interpretation of the NMR data can be challenging. This is true in particular for the cuprate high-temperature superconductors. Over the years, a large base of NMR data became available, which makes a review of the early interpretation possible. Recently, it was shown that all planar $^{17}$O NMR shift and relaxation data available in the literature point to a temperature independent but doping dependent pseudogap, very similar to what was proposed from the electronic entropy. Here we analyze the anisotropy of the shift and relaxation of planar O to establish whether a single electronic spin component is applicable, since the planar Cu shift anisotropy clearly fails such a description. We find that the orbital shift terms deduced from the data are in agreement with first principle calculations, and the shift data show a temperature independent anisotropy also in agreement with hyperfine coefficients predicted by first principles, which also account for the relaxation anisotropy. Furthermore, we show that the original $^{89}$Y shift and relaxation data are in agreement with the proposed temperature independent pseudogap. This pseudogap depends on doping, but also on the family of materials, and the density of states outside or in the absence of the gap is universal for the cuprates; this suggests that the entropy should be similar for all cuprates, as well. Further consequences will be discussed.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 82 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6.6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 60 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6.63 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 62 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6.8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 84 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6.96 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 92 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa1.92Sr0.08Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 89 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu4O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 81 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.76Sr0.24CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 25 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Tl2Ba2CuOx Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 85 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Tl2Ba2Ca2Cu3O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 125 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Dynamical Mean Field Studies of Infinite Layer Nickelates: Physics Results and Methodological Implications
similarity 0.96Hanghui Chen et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.02852
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Soft X-ray Spectroscopy of Low-Valence Nickelates
similarity 0.95M. Hepting et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2111.02511
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional pairing in few-fermion systems at finite temperature
similarity 0.94Daniel Pęcak & Tomasz Sowiński · 2022 · arXiv:2202.07639
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev Reflections in NbN/graphene Junctions under Large Magnetic Fields
similarity 0.93Da Wang et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2109.06285
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamic interaction between chiral currents and surface waves in topological superfluids: a pathway to detect Majorana fermions?
similarity 0.92S. Forstner et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.19469
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Current Flow in Topological Insulator Josephson Junctions due to Imperfections
similarity 0.92Kiryl Piasotski et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2411.10335
Source status unknown — claims are unverified