Ternary Metal Oxide Substrates for Superconducting Circuits
Zach Degnan, Xin He, Alejandro Gomez Frieiro, Yauhen P. Sachkou, Arkady Fedorov, Peter Jacobson
arXiv:2201.06228 · DOI 10.1088/2633-4356/ac70a2 · 2022-01-17 · Materials for Quantum Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Substrate material imperfections and surface losses are one of the major factors limiting superconducting quantum circuitry from reaching the scale and complexity required to build a practicable quantum computer. One potential path towards higher coherence of superconducting quantum devices is to explore new substrate materials with a reduced density of imperfections due to inherently different surface chemistries. Here, we examine two ternary metal oxide materials, spinel (MgAl2O4) and lanthanum aluminate (LaAlO3), with a focus on surface and interface characterization and preparation. Devices fabricated on LaAlO3 have quality factors three times higher than earlier devices, which we attribute to a reduction in interfacial disorder. MgAl2O4 is a new material in the realm of superconducting quantum devices and, even in the presence of significant surface disorder, consistently outperforms LaAlO3. Our results highlight the importance of materials exploration, substrate preparation, and characterization to identify materials suitable for high-performance superconducting quantum circuitry.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Near-field localization of the boson peak on tantalum films for superconducting quantum devices
similarity 0.92Xiao Guo et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.14316
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Noise and loss of superconducting aluminium resonators at single photon energies
similarity 0.88Jonathan Burnett et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1801.10204
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Linear and nonlinear properties of a compact high-kinetic-inductance WSi multimode resonator
similarity 0.88Naftali Kirsh et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.13264
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Integration of through-sapphire substrate machining with superconducting quantum processors
similarity 0.88Narendra Acharya et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.09930
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase transformation-induced superconducting aluminium-silicon alloy rings
similarity 0.87B. C. Johnson et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2207.05343
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microresonators fabricated from high-kinetic-inductance Aluminum films
similarity 0.87Wenyuan Zhang et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1807.00210
Source status unknown — claims are unverified